Quote:
Originally Posted by Not Insane
I did not word my response very precisely. I don't mean the definitions of the word. I mean which speech to which they apply. Two examples:
1. Those claiming the russia interference claims were baloney were labelled as spouting misinformation or disinformation. Yet they have been vindicated, while those claiming it was real are the ones that were sharing mis- and dis-information. Yet many tried to cancel those that thought it was a hoax.
2. Same thing happened with the Hunter Laptop.
We all know what the dictionary definition of the WORDS, mis- and dis-information. I'm talking about what words ARE mis- and dis-information. Some think we need a "ministry of truth". The only person to ever live that could be trusted to head such an agency was hung on a cross over 2000 years ago. Fortunately, he's still alive, but he's dealing with more pressing matters, letting us work this out ourselves, all the while demonstrating in our responses why we need Him.
|
You post so much rubbish I'm ignoring you from now on. You are no longer relevant, if you ever were.