Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
WTF? A federal judge in CA already said that the fake elector scheme was more likely than not a crime. Its author, John Eastman, (and a bunch of other Trump lawyers) face disbarment (or worse) for it.
Watch the Nessell statement on YouTube.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chicks
Wow. Following the "logic" of a diseased mind like Whell's is really something to behold. He's as sick as his Dear Leader.
|
You both need to get a clue:
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/0...ctors-00006186
If you're in search of a diseased mind, you've found it in Dana Nessel. She's demonstrated on several occasions that she's not above using her office to pursue a political agenda, including the use of
very questionable legal tactics that even Democrats MI Supreme Court Justices couldn't countenance.
Sorry, but this one has a long way to go before you guys should start getting excited about folks in MI doing perp walks.
Besides, this isn't really about these alleged "false electors". This is about building a "criminal conspiracy" case that the Dems can attempt to tie to Trump.
But you go right on getting excited about it because flimsy stuff like this is really all you've got to get excited about for 2024.