Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #71  
Old 10-07-2012, 12:42 AM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,327
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
I'm still chewing on the part where she single-handedly won two "hearings" at the Supreme Court.

John
Me to. Any clue as to what she's talking about?
Reply With Quote
  #72  
Old 10-07-2012, 08:41 AM
wgrr's Avatar
wgrr wgrr is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 1,252
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
I'm still chewing on the part where she single-handedly won two "hearings" at the Supreme Court.

John
Looks like the post has been deleted.

I am pretty sure you have to be a member of the bar, in good standing, and admitted to practice in the highest court in your state for three years before you can even apply, for a license, to argue cases before the SCOTUS.

At least that is what I remember Janet doing in the early 90's. Yes, she has argued before the SCOTUS and has written many SCOTUS briefs for clients who were all lawyers. Very stressful hard work. I am glad she quit doing it. We literally would go through cases of paper printing the briefs out only to discover a margin is 1/8 of an inch off. At that time the professional printers were still active and the courts made format rules to protect them. They would actually measure the margins when you submitted the brief. If it did not "measure up" they rejected it.

Funny thing is you do not need to have a legal education to serve on the SCOTUS. You do have to have knowledge of the law though.

FAQ from SCOTUS website:

"Are there qualifications to be a Justice? Do you have to be a lawyer or attend law school to be a Supreme Court Justice?"

"The Constitution does not specify qualifications for Justices such as age, education, profession, or native-born citizenship. A Justice does not have to be a lawyer or a law school graduate, but all Justices have been trained in the law. Many of the 18th and 19th century Justices studied law under a mentor because there were few law schools in the country."

"The last Justice to be appointed who did not attend any law school was James F. Byrnes (1941-1942). He did not graduate from high school and taught himself law, passing the bar at the age of 23.
Robert H. Jackson (1941-1956) did not attend an undergraduate college, but took some law school classes without graduating."

Painter are you a lawyer?
Reply With Quote
  #73  
Old 10-07-2012, 11:18 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by wgrr View Post
Looks like the post has been deleted.
I'm sure it was done in error. Fortunately, boba quoted her in a reply so we still have a reference to painter's rather formidable accomplishments.

"My friend...when you go to a Supreme Court hearing and WIN...TWICE (without representation) you needn't have your statements graded. Just saying..."

Quote:
Painter are you a lawyer?
Yes, I wonder too, but then, "without representation" (pro se) suggests that she isn't. Very impressive!


John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.

Last edited by Boreas; 10-07-2012 at 11:20 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:47 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.