Which is it?

[Fast_Eddie]

Originally Posted by whell

Lots has been flying here. Was it me that you're suggesting missed your post? Which one?

The one you quoted but didn't bother to respond to in post #16. I made an effort to answer your question in a serious and informative way.

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Whell, the fact remains that Palin, Bachmann and Angle were all cheerleaders for the 2nd Amendment solution (phrased differently among them). Along of a sudden, a miscreant perceives a politician with whom he has a bitch and he shoots her, demonstrating to the world what a 2nd Amendment solution looks like.

What should the public be doing - continuing to cheer these 3 gals when they allude to the 2nd Amendment solution? No, such demagogues should be shunned. Simple as that.

Amen.

Dave

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by BlueStreak

Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Whell, the fact remains that Palin, Bachmann and Angle were all cheerleaders for the 2nd Amendment solution (phrased differently among them). Along of a sudden, a miscreant perceives a politician with whom he has a bitch and he shoots her, demonstrating to the world what a 2nd Amendment solution looks like.

What should the public be doing - continuing to cheer these 3 gals when they allude to the 2nd Amendment solution? No, such demagogues should be shunned. Simple as that.
Amen.

Dave

it's not gonna happen

these people initially scrubbed their websites but after huddling they pronounced themselves innocent and will carry on as always except now with indignation.

[BlueStreak]

The whole attempt to downplay the rhetoric and vitriol of those on what I view as the extreme right, the Bachmanns, Palins and Becks of this country, as mundane, run of the mill political fodder is ludicrous. The shear volume of it has been staggering and the mindless parroting of slogans and cliche's by "rank and file" wingnuts and right wing punditry has been like listening to ten million broken records.

And yet........."Who? Us? Why we would never..........."

It is such a bizarre notion that I scarcely believe Monty Python could have conceived of such ridiculous nonsense.

Dave

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by BlueStreak

The whole attempt to downplay the rhetoric and vitriol of those on what I view as the extreme right, the Bachmanns, Palins and Becks of this country, as mundane, run of the mill political fodder is ludicrous. The shear volume of it has been staggering and the mindless parroting of slogans and cliche's by "rank and file" wingnuts and right wing punditry has been like listening to ten million broken records.

And yet........."Who? Us? Why we would never..........."

It is such a bizarre notion that I scarcely believe Monty Python could have conceived of such ridiculous nonsense.

Dave

plus one

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by whell

Provide proof that the shooter paid any attention to any of the individuals mentioned above, and I might listen to any more of this BS. The evidence continues to mount that none of these individuals, nor anything they may have said, influenced the shooter AT ALL. Simple as that.

Actually Finn's words were very simple and did not state what you infer, I gather English is not your strong point.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie

The one you quoted but didn't bother to respond to in post #16. I made an effort to answer your question in a serious and informative way.

Your statement "by your definition", and the connections to the Mosque story, made little sense to me.

My contention in this case, and I think I've been pretty consistent on this, is that there is no conclusive evidence connect the shooter to the political right, Palin, Fox News, etc., as some folks this forum appear to wish to tie him to.

In the case of the mosque, the suggestion was that the organization looking to build the Ground Zero Mosque was being rather tone deaf, not that they were somehow responsible for 9/11. I was supportive of those who wanted to investigate where the Imam got his support and funds, because his stated intentions seemed very much out of phase with his plan. To connect the stories is, to me, an apples an oranges comparison.

On the other hand, if you truly believe that the folks were wrong to suggest that the Imam was tied to 9/11, then consistency would suggest that you should be equally outspoken against those who want to tie the shooter to the "political right", since there is no evidence of any such ties.

[merrylander]

Ay Dios mio.

[whell]

Originally Posted by merrylander

Actually Finn's words were very simple and did not state what you infer, I gather English is not your strong point.

This is the post I was responding to, so I guess my English is just fine.

"Whell, the fact remains that Palin, Bachmann and Angle were all cheerleaders for the 2nd Amendment solution (phrased differently among them). Along of a sudden, a miscreant perceives a politician with whom he has a bitch and he shoots her

[Fast_Eddie]

Originally Posted by whell

Your statement "by your definition", and the connections to the Mosque story, made little sense to me.

I'm shocked. Sorry man. There are a load of people on the right I can disagree with but have a productive conversation with. You seem too deeply indoctrinated to consider that some of your positions are as knee jerk as those you criticize on the other side. No worries, I was the same way not all too long ago.

Originally Posted by whell

On the other hand, if you truly believe that the folks were wrong to suggest that the Imam was tied to 9/11, then consistency would suggest that you should be equally outspoken against those who want to tie the shooter to the "political right", since there is no evidence of any such ties.

Have you read my posts on the subject? But, as I said above, it doesn't much matter what I say. I'm a Democrat, so you're quite sure sure that you already know all my opinions before I post them.