Polls - Clinton Fading

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Boreas

She takes credit for talking Bill into vetoing the Bankruptcy first time around. Said so in her autobiography.

Are you calling Hillary a liar, Bob?

2:47

Flogging, flogging, flogging.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Flogging, flogging, flogging.

You asked for an example and I gave you one. It's not my fault if you don't like the answer.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Boreas

You asked for an example and I gave you one. It's not my fault if you don't like the answer.

Still not proving Tom's contention that she's owned by Wall St., John.
I'm sure you'll find something somewhere someday if you just believe and click your heels together three times.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Still not proving Tom's contention that she's owned by Wall St., John.
I'm sure you'll find something somewhere someday if you just believe and click your heels together three times.

Not my job, Bob. You said:

Originally Posted by bobabode

I suppose you have some evidence that she's changed a vote in the past? Let's see it.

So I showed you one. You should probably be more careful about the questions you ask.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Boreas

Not my job, Bob. You said:


So I showed you one. You should probably be more careful about the questions you ask.

First ladies don't vote but you keep shouting up that dead equine's butt, if that's what floats your boat, John.

[icenine]

Originally Posted by Boreas

One of countless other reprehensible statements and actions. And still Hillary can't pull clear. This will change nothing. His supporters will think what he did in this case is perfectly okay because he was attacking a Muslim.

Reuters and PPP have her up by 5 points on Real Clear.

I bet she goes double digits by next weekend, and if I am wrong at least I am hoping she goes up in the polls.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by bobabode

First ladies don't vote but you keep shouting up that dead equine's butt, if that's what floats your boat, John.

But their husbands veto, which is what happened in this case and which, if you think about it, is an anagram for vote. If "Lying Hillary" is to be believed, she's the reason he did. No, she didn't change her vote but she changed her position from one of moral conviction to one of expedience, to satisfy a powerful constituency. In the first instance, she used her influence to defeat the bill. In the second instance, she voted for the same legislation she had convinced Bill to veto.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by icenine

Reuters and PPP have her up by 5 points on Real Clear.

I bet she goes double digits by next weekend, and if I am wrong at least I am hoping she goes up in the polls.

Me too. Her negatives are falling too.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Boreas

But their husbands veto, which is what happened in this case and which, if you think about it, is an anagram for vote. If "Lying Hillary" is to be believed, she's the reason he did. No, she didn't change her vote but she changed her position from one of moral conviction to one of expedience, to satisfy a powerful constituency. In the first instance, she used her influence to defeat the bill. In the second instance, she voted for the same legislation she had convinced Bill to veto.

Now you're just repeating yourself, John.

Sorry, no sale.

[Zeke]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Me too. Her negatives are falling too.

Absolutely, especially as folks realize (regarding any additional email stuff coming out) Classification is not always obvious, and reasonable people frequently differ on whether something should be classified or not. Unless something is marked classified, it's unfair to say that it is certainly classified.

What we do know is that of the 30,000 some emails, only three were actually marked classified somewhere deep in their body, and not at the top as they should have been. At least two of these were mistakenly marked.

Further, the 100 or so that were supposedly classified but not marked as such only constitute 0.3% of the emails that were sent, and without seeing them, I'm betting that State and CIA have vigorous disagreements about them. Further, even if all of them were sent using the state.gov email system, it would be just as big a problem, since that's also an unclassified network.

A Post analysis showed that over 300 people sent information that is now considered classified in the emails, some of whom aren't even in government. What this really shows is that we have a big overclassification issue, and that this whole thing is nothing more than a politically motivated attempt to criminalize good civil servants doing their job.

Basically, she's winning.