Hillary For President

[Rajoo]

More on Hillary's shenanigans.

Clinton fundraising leaves little for state parties

In the days before Hillary Clinton launched an unprecedented big-money fundraising vehicle with state parties last summer, she vowed “to rebuild our party from the ground up,” proclaiming “when our state parties are strong, we win. That’s what will happen."

But less than 1 percent of the $61 million raised by that effort has stayed in the state parties’ coffers, according to a POLITICO analysis of the latest Federal Election Commission filings.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/0...parties-222670

This news item came to me via Bernie's campaign email today. So what has been promised to Debbie WS, who must be complicit in this fraud? Ambassador to Cuba?

So Bob, quit claiming Hillary is raising money for the party.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by whell

Why so angry, John?

Apart from you stating the obvious, I've had it with the DNC shoving Clinton down my throat.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Another poll out showing Trump edging ahead of her nationally. She still leads in the aggregate average but that's getting narrower all the time. By the time November rolls around she will down by double digits. And there will be great wailing and gnashing of teeth amongst you Hillary backers. And don't even think about trying to put that on Bernie. You will have done it to yourselves by backing a loser.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...d-over-clinton

It's Rasmussen, dude.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

Around half the Democrats support Bernie over Hillary and she needs Bernie's supporters to win. Bernie is not hurting Hillary, (that's an establishment/DNC guilt tripping at work), Hillary is hurting herself with these ridiculous campaign tactics which only helps alienate Bernie supporters even more. If you haven't noticed, Trump seems to have the nomination sown up and Hillary should be looking ahead and try to woo Bernie's supporters.

"Half"? Three million+ Democratic voters would disagree with that.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by bobabode

The headline says the exact opposite of what she said and what her policies are towards out of work coal miners. This is Whell worthy, nice try...

"We've got to both move toward a clean energy future ... but we also have to remember who turned on the lights and powered the factories and provided the energy that we needed to build our country," Clinton said, speaking from West Virginia in an interview with MSNBC.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-us...-idUSKCN0XU1TV

What's wrong with the headline? Here is her actual quote unless your interpret the word remember differently than I do, which is the double speak I was referring to.

Thanks for the compliment, whell puts up one hell of an argument even when he is wrong, which is seldom.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by icenine

If Hillary is the establishment, and presents the greatest bulwark against Trump, then I am going for the establishment. All Sanders is doing is helping Trump at this stage.

In cast you haven't noticed through haze of your Hillary love, this is an anti establishment year. That's why Trump is going to be the Republican nominee and why Bernie is better positioned to take him on. Hillary represents the last gasp of the establishment.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

More on Hillary's shenanigans.

Clinton fundraising leaves little for state parties


This news item came to me via Bernie's campaign email today. So what has been promised to Debbie WS, who must be complicit in this fraud? Ambassador to Cuba?

So Bob, quit claiming Hillary is raising money for the party.

Politico? Isn't that 'Tiger Beat on the Potomac'?

You need to do some more research Rajoo. I can find some links for you if your search engine is broken.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Boreas

In cast you haven't noticed through haze of your Hillary love, this is an anti establishment year. That's why Trump is going to be the Republican nominee and why Bernie is better positioned to take him on. Hillary represents the last gasp of the establishment.

Is that why Bernie's losing by far more than Hillary was in '08?

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by bobabode

"Half"? Three million+ Democratic voters would disagree with that.

You're right.

It's only about 45%.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epo...tion-3824.html

So how many of Bernie's voters do you think Hillary can afford to piss away?

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Another poll out showing Trump edging ahead of her nationally. She still leads in the aggregate average but that's getting narrower all the time. By the time November rolls around she will down by double digits. And there will be great wailing and gnashing of teeth amongst you Hillary backers. And don't even think about trying to put that on Bernie. You will have done it to yourselves by backing a loser.

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/...d-over-clinton

Rasmussen is a Republican poll.