Hillary For President

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by 4-2-7

Are you trying to say in total?

He said what he was "trying" to say which is a hell of a lot more than can be said of you.

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

4-2-7, you have not attributed material that is obviously quoted. Unless you claim authorship of it, we must remove it as a violation of copyright laws. You have a chance to summarize it and provide links or simply remove it, but it cannot remain as plagiarized material.

From Wikipedia

Can I reuse Wikipedia's content somewhere else?

Main page: Wikipedia:Reusing Wikipedia content
Wikipedia's textual content is copyrighted, but you may reuse it under the terms of our licensing requirements, summarized below.
Most text in Wikipedia, excluding quotations, has been released under the Creative Commons Attribution-Sharealike 3.0 Unported License (CC-BY-SA) and the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts) and can therefore be reused only if you release any derived work under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License or the GFDL. This requires that, among other things, you attribute the authors and allow others to freely copy your work. (See Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License and Wikipedia:Text of the GNU Free Documentation License for full details.)
Some text has been imported only under CC-BY-SA and CC-BY-SA-compatible licenses and cannot be reused under GFDL; such text will be identified either on the page footer, in the page history or the discussion page of the article that utilizes the text. All text published before June 15th, 2009 on Wikipedia was released under the GFDL, and you may also use the page history to retrieve content published before that date to ensure GFDL compatibility.
If you are unwilling or unable to use the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License or the GNU Free Documentation License for your work, use of Wikipedia content is unauthorized. Small quotations of Wikipedia content, with its source attributed, may be permissible under the "fair use" clause of US copyright law. See Wikipedia:Citing Wikipedia for information about the proper citation of articles. No permission is needed to create a hyperlink to Wikipedia or its articles.
Images used in Wikipedia may have their own, completely independent licensing scheme. Looking at an image's description page by clicking on the image itself should ideally tell you the copyright status of the image. Many images are either in the public domain or licensed under copyleft licenses (such as the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License), but many are copyrighted and used on Wikipedia under the "fair use" clause of US copyright law.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipe..._my_article.3F


So D-Ray what does this truly meen? Out of curiosity

It looks to me that we can copy most of what is on Wiki.

7. Licensing of Content
To grow the commons of free knowledge and free culture, all users contributing to the Projects are required to grant broad permissions to the general public to re-distribute and re-use their contributions freely, so long as that use is properly attributed and the same freedom to re-use and re-distribute is granted to any derivative works. In keeping with our goal of providing free information to the widest possible audience, we require that when necessary all submitted content be licensed so that it is freely reusable by anyone who cares to access it.
You agree to the following licensing requirements:
Text to which you hold the copyright: When you submit text to which you hold the copyright, you agree to license it under:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License (“CC BY-SA”), and
GNU Free Documentation License (“GFDL”) (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

Re-use: Re-use of content that we host is welcome, though exceptions exist for content contributed under "fair use" or similar exemptions under copyright law. Any re-use must comply with the underlying license(s).
When you re-use or re-distribute a text page developed by the Wikimedia community, you agree to attribute the authors in any of the following fashions:
Through hyperlink (where possible) or URL to the page or pages that you are re-using (since each page has a history page that lists all authors and editors);
Through hyperlink (where possible) or URL to an alternative, stable online copy that is freely accessible, which conforms with the license, and which provides credit to the authors in a manner equivalent to the credit given on the Project website; or
Through a list of all authors (but please note that any list of authors may be filtered to exclude very small or irrelevant contributions).
https://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/Terms_of_Use

[bobabode]

Here is the rule D-Ray is talking about.

Copyright:
Copyright infringement is illegal. Politicalchat.org will enforce the law. Please do not post an article in its entirety. When posting copyrighted material, please use small sections or link to the article. When posting copyrighted material you must give credit to the author in your post. You are responsible for including links/credit, regardless of how you originally came across the material.

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Here is the rule D-Ray is talking about.

Copyright:
Copyright infringement is illegal. Politicalchat.org will enforce the law. Please do not post an article in its entirety. When posting copyrighted material, please use small sections or link to the article. When posting copyrighted material you must give credit to the author in your post. You are responsible for including links/credit, regardless of how you originally came across the material.

Cool acording to rules at Politicalchat.org

And copyright laws

And terms and conditions at Wikipedia

I'm in compliance..

[4-2-7]

So BeamOn Who's Recession is it?

[bobabode]

Troll on back to Breitbarts, -5. No one is playing your game here.

[4-2-7]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Troll on back to Breitbarts, -5. No one is playing your game here.

The problem with left wing zealots is they can't stand the truth. Always wanting to suppress it or completely wipe it away. They dont want any speech but what they deem is acceptable to them.

The problem with that is they become their own worst enimy as one day they will look around and only one person is allowed to speek.

[bobabode]

Funny how ignoring someone is somehow restricting their right to "speek" sic.

[bobabode]

Anywho-back on topic.
Hillary still on top in the national polls.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/

[Rex E.]

I thought -5 was out practicing his cartography with all the buried gold he has...