Clinton e-mails, for the lawyers

[Tom Joad]

For what it's worth Beamer, I have no problem with you. I think you raise some valid points regarding Clintons candidacy.

As for the other two, no. They are just continuing the spewing of right wing hate for Hillary that has been going on non stop since 1993.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by catswiththum

I suppose when one lacks the intellect and reason to fashion a sensible argument, all that is left is to pick over the offerings of others.

Sad, but not uncommon.

Haughty little snob.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

For what it's worth Beamer, I have no problem with you. I think you raise some valid points regarding Clintons candidacy.

As for the other two, no. They are just continuing the spewing of right wing hate for Hillary that has been going on non stop since 1993.

TJ, I understand that (thanks!) and simply messing with you on a friendly basis. By nature and training I tend to be very objective.

[catswiththum]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Haughty little snob.

Pipe down - no need to project your insecurity on to me or defend him - if he acts like an asshole and takes a poke at me he can deal with the answer.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by catswiththum

Pipe down - no need to project your insecurity on to me or defend him - if he acts like an asshole and takes a poke at me he can deal with the answer.

Yes, I can.

Can you "deal with" formulating a response that isn't a pathetic ad hominem insult? Or is that to much for you?

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by catswiththum

Pipe down - no need to project your insecurity on to me or defend him - if he acts like an asshole and takes a poke at me he can deal with the answer.

I figured you were talking to me.

But if you were not that's OK.

You're still a haughty little snob trying to impress people with your Russian novel reading and shit.

You're not the only one with a college degree.

I have several myself.

And just because I can't remember a goddamn thing from any of the courses I took doesn't mean I'm impressed that you can.

[catswiththum]

What are you talking about?

Everyone on this board has a college degree or two or three.

I should just use one syllable words so you don't get your knickers in a twist when you don't feel like keeping up? Give me a break.

[catswiththum]

Originally Posted by Boreas

Yes, I can.

Can you "deal with" formulating a response that isn't a pathetic ad hominem insult? Or is that to much for you?

I will stop tossing grenades if you will.

[donquixote99]

I've just been through all 6 existing pages of this thread, looking for posts that even allude to some claim of objective wrongdoing by Hillary.

I have found one. Here it is:

Originally Posted by Dondilion

There are laws which deal with the security of communications. Clinton was aware of these protocols since she herself advised juniors.

However she adopted a lax attitude to her handling of e mails.

I can find lots of posts that cite pre-existing negative opinions of Hillary (she's not 'trustworthy,' etc). But these offer no actual reason to oppose her candidacy, if one does not find the poster's opinion to be authority enough....

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by catswiththum

I will stop tossing grenades if you will.

Is that what those are?

I'll take it under advisement.