Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas
This is exactly right, of course. Hillary's failure to disclose the donation to the Clinton Foundation is a violation of no law. It's just that it's not in keeping with the voluntary agreement she made with President Obama as a condition of employment. Also, it's not clear that Bill Clinton's speaking fee needed to be reported at all.
|
It still runs afoul of Federal conflict-of-interest laws. There needn't be a quid pro quo and spousal income from people/interests with business before you is identical to you receiving the income directly (or at least so said my annual ethics training and instructions of my annual Federal assets/income declaration). It's clear to me that a division chief at State would definitely have been fired and/or prosecuted for exactly what Hillary did.