Darren Wilson's Side of the Story

[sheltiedave]

Of course I don't. And I know you don't as well.

That is why a lot of us are asking questions why the asst. DAs did what they did. They presented all of it without prejudicial statements prior, but plenty of prejudice within the statements. That keyed the grand jury that they were hearing bullshit, when they would not get away with that in a trial.

If you accept ambiguity on whether Wilson was charging, why can't you accept near unanimous testimony that he attempted some form of surrender?

The blood spread pattern at the point where he stopped , there is a second spread a few feet forward of that, and the the huge one where he passed. It would have been interesting to hear the forensic evidence in court, and see closeups of the droplets, which would allow us the opportunity to discern as well. Alas.....