Darren Wilson's Side of the Story

[sheltiedave]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Who said drive away.

You hit the gas and move the vehicle 5-10 feet.

Threat over.

If Wilson had followed the St. Louis Police Academy training for this type of incident, without backup, he would have pulled back and maintained a ten to fifteen foot "safe" distance the entire time, as much as practicable. But of course, he didn't attend the St. Louis Police Academy, because he was not accepted.

But, as I noted earlier, it was a bad day for following protocols and standard operating procedures.

[sheltiedave]

Golly gee, we get thrown into the conspiracy boat here, when we have a far more important conspiracy brought up by DJ and his ilk here....

Michelle Obama is a man, a man, I tell you! That makes President B a gay black Muslim man from Kenya! http://www.politicalchat.org/showthread.php?t=7292

:

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by sheltiedave

If Wilson had followed the St. Louis Police Academy training for this type of incident, without backup, he would have pulled back and maintained a ten to fifteen foot "safe" distance the entire time, as much as practicable. But of course, he didn't attend the St. Louis Police Academy, because he was not accepted.

Or, since he didn't have the advantage of that training he could have, as an alternative, used common sense, but he missed out on that too.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by finnbow

So, DA's should recuse themselves every time that evidence does not support an indictment?

No, they should recuse themselves because Certs is a candy mint!

Or else they should recuse themselves for the gross appearance of partiality in the case, AS WAS SAID. No one advanced the straw man position indicated in your question.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Or, since he didn't have the advantage of that training he could have, as an alternative, used common sense, but he missed out on that too.

Says the Tom Brady of morning-morning quarterbacks.

[Rex E.]

OK...I won't go into all or the pro Wilson assumptions (you all keep saying he knew he was dealing with a "Felon Thug" If I'm to believe this then I'd also believe that Brown knew Wilson had Klan ties)

So, the only witness aside from Wilson that could have seen or heard anything close by is Brows friend Jones who tells a very different story from what Wilson tells......why has he been dismissed completely?

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Rex E.

OK...I won't go into all or the pro Wilson assumptions (you all keep saying he knew he was dealing with a "Felon Thug" If I'm to believe this then I'd also believe that Brown knew Wilson had Klan ties)

So, the only witness aside from Wilson that could have seen or heard anything close by is Brows friend Jones who tells a very different story from what Wilson tells......why has he been dismissed completely?

Because he was an accomplice to a felony whose testimony didn't align with the physical evidence?

[Rex E.]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Because he was an accomplice to a felony whose testimony didn't align with the physical evidence?

Shoplifting is now a felony?

What evidence shown proves that Wilson did not grab Brown vs the opposite?

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Rex E.

Shoplifting is now a felony?

What evidence shown proves that Wilson did not grab Brown vs the opposite?

No, aggravated assault is.

[bobabode]

Accomplice to a felony? How so?

edit-Brown's little friend refused to steal the cigars that Brown handed to him. In the video he was seen to put the cigars back on the counter.