Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-15-2014, 11:06 AM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
Bush/Cheney Created Conditions that Led Directly to ISIL

You're Goddamned right they did and it's about time they took some personal responsibility for it.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/robert...usaolp00000592

Bush/Cheney Created Conditions that Led Directly to ISIL
Posted: 09/15/2014 4:46 am EDT Updated: 4 hours ago

It takes a lot of gall for people like Dick Cheney to utter even one critical word about President Obama's strategy to eliminate the threat of ISIL in the Middle East.

In fact, it was the unnecessary Bush/Cheney Iraq War that created the conditions that led directly to the rise of the "Islamic State in Iraq and the Levant" (ISIL).

Former George H.W. Bush Secretary of State James Baker said as much on this week's edition of "Meet the Press." He noted that after the first President Bush had ousted Saddam Hussein from Kuwait in 1991, the U.S. had refrained from marching on Baghdad precisely to avoid kicking over the sectarian hornet's nest that was subsequently unleashed by the Bush/Cheney attack on Iraq in 2003.

But it wasn't just the War in Iraq itself that set the stage for the subsequent 12 years of renewed, high-intensity sectarian strife between Sunni's and Shiites in the Middle East. It was also what came after.

Bush's "de-Bathification program" eliminated all vestiges of Sunni power in Iraqi society and set the stage for the Sunni insurrection against American occupation and the new Shiite-led government. Bush disbanded the entire Sunni-dominated Iraqi Army and bureaucracy. He didn't change it. He didn't make it more inclusive of Shiites and Kurds. He just disbanded it. It is no accident that two of the top commanders of today's ISIL are former commanders in the Saddam-era Iraqi military.



more here
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-15-2014, 11:18 AM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
I liked this one from that op ed piece, re: Cheney offering up advice on foreign policy.
"It reminds you of a bunch of arsonists standing at the scene of a fire criticizing the techniques used by the firefighters who are trying to extinguish the blaze they themselves have set." HuffPost
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-15-2014, 11:35 AM
icenine's Avatar
icenine icenine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego via Vermilion Ohio and Points Between
Posts: 11,547
Obama is just trying to salvage Bush and Cheney if you think about it. Cheney should just STFU.
You should not criticize someone trying to clean up your mess.
__________________
Never was there a time when I did not exist, nor you, nor in the future shall any of us cease to be.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-15-2014, 12:09 PM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine View Post
Cheney should just STFU.
You should not criticize someone trying to clean up your mess.
I wish someone would punch a hole in his chest and rip out that donated heart he has and give it to someone who deserves it.
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-15-2014, 12:12 PM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 15,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by icenine View Post
Obama is just trying to salvage Bush and Cheney if you think about it. Cheney should just STFU.
You should not criticize someone trying to clean up your mess.
Unless you want it white washed. Look even the GOP congress did not want to get involved in this. They claimed that Obama had the powers to launch war against ISIS, this after accusing him of being an imperial president.

Is ISIS an imminent threat to the security of the US? No. ISIS is a threat primarily to Saudi Arabia and Iran and it should be their game.
__________________
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-15-2014, 12:47 PM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeamOn View Post
Is ISIS an imminent threat to the security of the US? No. ISIS is a threat primarily to Saudi Arabia and Iran and it should be their game.
They would like nothing better than to sucker us into fighting another open ended guerrilla war 6,000 miles from home where they have home field advantage.

That's what these beheadings are all about, and it appears that it might work.
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-15-2014, 01:20 PM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 15,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad View Post
They would like nothing better than to sucker us into fighting another open ended guerrilla war 6,000 miles from home where they have home field advantage.

That's what these beheadings are all about, and it appears that it might work.
We should foment WW III there. A giant epic war, our MIC and EU will make out like bandits selling high tech weaponry. When it's all over, Ayatollah's and the Wahhabi's can kiss and make up.

Let's make sure that all the high tech weapons can be disabled remotely when this is all over. Finally when all the fighting is over and done with, they will both be so broke that they will have an oil war.

Mission accomplished.
__________________
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-15-2014, 01:34 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
The preferable solution is to not buy oil. Ramp up solar, wind and tidal alternatives to capacity and let 'em duke it out with scimitars.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-15-2014, 02:18 PM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
The preferable solution is to not buy oil. Ramp up solar, wind and tidal alternatives to capacity and let 'em duke it out with scimitars.
I think we just might be doing that as gasoline has droppe below $3.00 in some areas. That is not doing my pension the world of good.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-16-2014, 09:15 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Oh brother. Obama is responsible for exactly nothing.

Which is why he'll be remembered for golf.

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:06 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.