Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
“That way he will also have seniority, and that will help the interests of my constituents [because] he can be there in that consequential lame-duck session,”
Said Cantor, referring to Brat getting into office early. But if the lame-duck session is expected to be so consequential, shouldn't Cantor stay on, with his 14 years of seniority? Wouldn't that help the constituents a lot more than Brat with a few weeks of it?
|
He's quitting early so that he can go to work on K St. that much sooner as a lobbyist.
08-01-2014, 07:14 PM
Threaded Mode