Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
If there is anything more reliable and consistent than your reflexive defense of all things Trump, it's your retort of "strawman" whenever you're shown to be wrong, idiotic or hypocritical. I take it as a confirmation of the point you're objecting to.
|
You would. I've explained my position on this countless times, and you, like your buddy Chicklet, choose to ignore those facts for your own purposes. You've chosen to adopt the precarious position that ANY questioning of the leaked or printed (by WaPo etc) "facts" in the case of "Russian collusion" is defacto support of Trump. That's just a spin on the old "with us or against us" fallacy.
Your continued use of fallacies to support your arguments continues to illustrate that your logic has gaping holes. Here's a self-help book that might be right up your alley.