Make Ukraine a NATO member nation...right now.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

I'd prefer Trump not run again.

…but of course I’ll vote for him if he’s nominated.

Still unable to say anything against your Dear Leader. You love the ass. Sickening.

[whell]

Originally Posted by Chicks

…but of course I’ll vote for him if he’s nominated.

Still unable to say anything against your Dear Leader. You love the ass. Sickening.

I've said many things against Trump. It just doesn't suit your narrative, so you choose to ignore them like the dishonest turd that you are.

[whell]

Originally Posted by RickeyM

So you're saying you won't be voting for him should he be the Repub nominee?

That's correct. If Trump is the nominee, the Libertarian candidate will start looking like a very attractive option.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

If there is anything more reliable and consistent than your reflexive defense of all things Trump, it's your retort of "strawman" whenever you're shown to be wrong, idiotic or hypocritical. I take it as a confirmation of the point you're objecting to.

You would. I've explained my position on this countless times, and you, like your buddy Chicklet, choose to ignore those facts for your own purposes. You've chosen to adopt the precarious position that ANY questioning of the leaked or printed (by WaPo etc) "facts" in the case of "Russian collusion" is defacto support of Trump. That's just a spin on the old "with us or against us" fallacy.

Your continued use of fallacies to support your arguments continues to illustrate that your logic has gaping holes. Here's a self-help book that might be right up your alley.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

You would. I've explained my position on this countless times, and you, like your buddy Chicklet, choose to ignore those facts for your own purposes. You've chosen to adopt the precarious position that ANY questioning of the leaked or printed (by WaPo etc) "facts" in the case of "Russian collusion" is defacto support of Trump. That's just a spin on the old "with us or against us" fallacy.

Your continued use of fallacies to support your arguments continues to illustrate that your logic has gaping holes. Here's a self-help book that might be right up your alley.

But it is though. Why should it matter considering the current criminal charges he will soon face? Potential collusion charges are like a walk in the park.

Yet it seems to be important to the very same people who also believe he won in 2020. And you choose to step into this collusion/delusion mantra every time or so it seems. Are you going to change our minds? No.

Did Trump collude with Russia? Yes. (Grin)

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by whell

That's correct. If Trump is the nominee, the Libertarian candidate will start looking like a very attractive option.

…to a fool…

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

You would. I've explained my position on this countless times, and you, like your buddy Chicklet, choose to ignore those facts for your own purposes. You've chosen to adopt the precarious position that ANY questioning of the leaked or printed (by WaPo etc) "facts" in the case of "Russian collusion" is defacto support of Trump. That's just a spin on the old "with us or against us" fallacy....

I most certainly don't buy into the "no collusion, no obstruction" mantra like you do as it is unequivocally true that Trump's campaign did indeed coordinate with Russia as well as solicit and welcome Russian help. After that Trump engaged in obstruction. Moreover, it is also true that Trump and a good portion of MAGAWorld are cheerleaders for Putin's treachery.

Like it or not, Trump's lawlessness and traitorous conduct reflects upon those like you who routinely rationalize, deflect or equivocate in his defense. Squawking "straw man" doesn't change that.

[Chicks]

Deleted.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

That's correct. If Trump is the nominee, the Libertarian candidate will start looking like a very attractive option.

That's it, a copout vote? Excuse me if I remain unconvinced.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by RickeyM

That's it, a copout vote? Excuse me if I remain unconvinced.

I'm convinced. I'm sure whell knows as well as we do that Trump is a narcissistic lying grifter totally unfit to lead the country. He just keeps arguing about all that because that's how he gets his troll juice.