FAKE NEWS EXPOSED: A Service of PoliticalChat.com

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by finnbow

The Pulitzer Prize Board has an established, formal process by which complaints against winning entries are carefully reviewed. In the last three years, the Pulitzer Board has received inquiries, including from former President Donald Trump, about submissions from The New York Times and The Washington Post on Russian interference in the U.S. election and its connections to the Trump campaign--submissions that jointly won the 2018 National Reporting prize.

These inquiries prompted the Pulitzer Board to commission two independent reviews of the work submitted by those organizations to our National Reporting competition. Both reviews were conducted by individuals with no connection to the institutions whose work was under examination, nor any connection to each other. The separate reviews converged in their conclusions: that no passages or headlines, contentions or assertions in any of the winning submissions were discredited by facts that emerged subsequent to the conferral of the prizes.

The 2018 Pulitzer Prizes in National Reporting stand.

So, the publications on the receiving end of Trump's (and Whell's) "fake news" accusations were indeed truthful and accurate (unlike the Lying Dotard himself).

That's some serious egg on Whell's face. It's kind of funny how this long running thread he started has proven again and again and again how a college educated guy with a reasonable amount of intelligence can get everything so wrong when he drinks the bitter dregs served up by modern day conservative thoughtleaders. If he wasn't such an unpleasant fellow on this forum, I could dredge up a bit of sympathy for his plight.