18 and Dead.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by Zeke

Except that a shot was fired in the car. (You can't make that evidenced reality go away.)

If you assault an officer to the point they're backed into their car? You get shot.

What may have occurred before isn't terribly relevant.

The fact that the gun went off in the car does not, by itself, show where Mike Brown was, or what he was doing.

While it may be true that you get shot if you assault an officer to the point they're backed into their car, is it not also true that you may be shot if you don't?

You seem to be taking the fact that an officer shot Mr. Brown as proof that Brown needed shooting.

It's interesting that you assume things happened a certain way, without knowing, and then declare that based on your assumption, no other information (whatever it might be, you don't know) is relevant. Try to imagine my confidence in a justice system that reasons like this.