Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-23-2012, 10:10 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Facebook IPO - Lessons learned?

I'm curious what my friends on the left side of this forum think about the events surrounding the Facebook IPO. Here's a firm that where the number 1 and number 2 ranking officers - Zuckerberg and Sandberg, who now have net worth in excess of $15B and $5B respectively - are certainly Dems and lean left.

Yet the IPO has made them billionaires, and had been fraught with allegations of, at best, overvaluation of stock, to at worst insider trading and mis-communicated changes to the valuation of the stock within days of the IPO. CBS News called the IPO 'drenched in arrogance' as the stock was overvalued and over-hyped from the start, and the insiders fed and fueled the hype.

Now, I suspect that if this were a company owned and abetted by the political right, some folks on this forum would be chomping at the bit to post how the Wall Streeters are getting their "comeuppance" and how greedy the right leaning owners must have been. Does that same characterization apply to this IPO, and this company, and these newly minted lefty billionaires?

I also suspect our mainstream media - those who cover the finance / investing world - are a bit complicit here as well. I think many were caught up in Zuckerberg's celebrity rather than doing any objective analysis of Facebook's finances.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:11 AM
painter painter is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 785
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
I'm curious what my friends on the left side of this forum think about the events surrounding the Facebook IPO. Here's a firm that where the number 1 and number 2 ranking officers - Zuckerberg and Sandberg, who now have net worth in excess of $15B and $5B respectively - are certainly Dems and lean left.

Yet the IPO has made them billionaires, and had been fraught with allegations of, at best, overvaluation of stock, to at worst insider trading and mis-communicated changes to the valuation of the stock within days of the IPO. CBS News called the IPO 'drenched in arrogance' as the stock was overvalued and over-hyped from the start, and the insiders fed and fueled the hype.

Now, I suspect that if this were a company owned and abetted by the political right, some folks on this forum would be chomping at the bit to post how the Wall Streeters are getting their "comeuppance" and how greedy the right leaning owners must have been. Does that same characterization apply to this IPO, and this company, and these newly minted lefty billionaires?

I also suspect our mainstream media - those who cover the finance / investing world - are a bit complicit here as well. I think many were caught up in Zuckerberg's celebrity rather than doing any objective analysis of Facebook's finances.
Good post!



Borrowing from a Merrylander post....

http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/...NEW091211A.htm

There seems to be a double standard with where the wealth was acquired. If you are Oprah...a rock star, Michael Jordan, or made your millions as a box office star...the disparate is NOT!?
__________________
Gov. big enough to give you everything you want is big enough to take away everything you have.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:12 AM
CarlV's Avatar
CarlV CarlV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SF east bay
Posts: 4,456
Quote:
Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Sued Over Facebook IPO
By Don Jeffrey - May 23, 2012 8:04 AM PT
Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs Group Inc. (GS) and JPMorgan Chase & Co. were sued along with other underwriters and Facebook Inc. (FB) by investors who claimed they were misled in the purchase of the social network firm’s stock.

The investors said the members of a proposed class action, or group lawsuit, have lost more than $2.5 billion since the initial public offering last week, in a complaint filed today in Manhattan federal court. They claimed Facebook and the banks didn’t disclose lower revenue estimates.
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...ebook-ipo.html

Take that and this

Quote:
On Monday, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (NYSE:JPM) announced that it cancelled its share buy backs while rumors circulated that its trading loss is growing. The figure may now hit $7 billion.
http://www.valuewalk.com/2012/05/jpm...-to-7-billion/
Ain't that great, and that was with depositors money too. I hears on the radio that indeed the gov would bail them out too because of deregulation.

And now Greece seriously looking to default.

Gonna be an interesting summer money wise.


Carl
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:27 AM
Dondilion's Avatar
Dondilion Dondilion is offline
Jigsawed
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,189
Can you expand on your labeling the Face guys Lefties.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:40 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
I'm curious what my friends on the left side of this forum think about the events surrounding the Facebook IPO. Here's a firm that where the number 1 and number 2 ranking officers - Zuckerberg and Sandberg, who now have net worth in excess of $15B and $5B respectively - are certainly Dems and lean left.

Yet the IPO has made them billionaires, and had been fraught with allegations of, at best, overvaluation of stock, to at worst insider trading and mis-communicated changes to the valuation of the stock within days of the IPO. CBS News called the IPO 'drenched in arrogance' as the stock was overvalued and over-hyped from the start, and the insiders fed and fueled the hype.

Now, I suspect that if this were a company owned and abetted by the political right, some folks on this forum would be chomping at the bit to post how the Wall Streeters are getting their "comeuppance" and how greedy the right leaning owners must have been. Does that same characterization apply to this IPO, and this company, and these newly minted lefty billionaires?

I also suspect our mainstream media - those who cover the finance / investing world - are a bit complicit here as well. I think many were caught up in Zuckerberg's celebrity rather than doing any objective analysis of Facebook's finances.
How on earth is this a smear on the left as you are suggesting?

It's not.

Modern capitalism is a gambling game in which the participants try to rig the game.

The right is the group that wants the games to be left alone so all can try and rig their bets the left wants capitalism to return to what it was pre casino days.


Why are you so damned confused about these things?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:42 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion View Post
Can you expand on your labeling the Face guys Lefties.
I think he thinks Facebook folks are lefties because he things folks a on the right are to scared to use Facebook. All that info about them out there would require them to scrap the guns and buy tanks to feel safe.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:49 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by CarlV View Post
Take that and this

Ain't that great, and that was with depositors money too. I hears on the radio that indeed the gov would bail them out too because of deregulation.

And now Greece seriously looking to default.

Gonna be an interesting summer money wise.


Carl
Wow, and here I thought Dodd-Frank fixed all that....
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:50 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Don, commies, pinkos, marxists...

Couldn't resist, sorry.

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:52 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
How on earth is this a smear on the left as you are suggesting?

It's not.

Modern capitalism is a gambling game in which the participants try to rig the game.

The right is the group that wants the games to be left alone so all can try and rig their bets the left wants capitalism to return to what it was pre casino days.


Why are you so damned confused about these things?
Open up your closed little mind, noone. I believe you've participated in the rants in this forum against corporate greed and the evils of capitalism. Yet, here are some prominent leftists who got caught all wide - eyed at the prospect of making a killing in the market. Using your terms, they were willing to "rig their bets" by over-valuing their stock price in an IPO. Now that they're caught with a bit of egg on their face, how do you account for their actions?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-23-2012, 11:54 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dondilion View Post
Can you expand on your labeling the Face guys Lefties.
Not my label. Zuckerberg and Sandberg are fairly open in their support for the Donkeys.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:51 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.