Ah yes, the dirty crude. It is OK with me as long as it is Texas and not the Chevron Richmond Ca. refinery.

They tried to get one over with a false EIR and lied saying it was
only a modernization upgrade. When our Green Party mayor and the not bought councilman along with Citizens For A Better Environment caught on and blocked it via lawsuit. Of course come election time, Chevron spent 300,000 on a character assassination on the mayor and gave the old school bought-and-paid-for opponent 700,000. Just like the health care fiasco, all of a sudden they are a bottomless pit of money when it comes time to get one over.
We are still waiting for an honest proposal because the people sure need work here. But Chevron is quiet except for trying to sue back some of their property taxes.
Quote:
In 2009, Chevron had the distinction of being the state’s largest industrial emitter of greenhouse gases. And 46 percent of the adults and 17 percent of kids in the town have asthma.
But Chevron’s plans for expansion would have included building in new systems so that the Richmond plant could refine heavier crude, which would have meant more pollution for the surrounding communities. The court ruled that Chevon broke the law when they conveniently failed to disclose their plans to refine dirtier oil that would have adverse affects on the community.
“Refineries that have begun the switch to heavier, dirtier crude oil emit up to 58 percent more greenhouse gases per barrel refined as compared wiht the average U.S. refinery,” said Greg Karras, a scientist with CBE said in a press release.
|
http://colorlines.com/archives/2010/...d_illegal.html
I hate to be a NIMBY about it but Texas government does not seem to care about such things.
Carl