Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-04-2011, 07:24 AM
doucanoe's Avatar
doucanoe doucanoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 462
At the request of the US Energy Dept. none the less...

http://www.nctimes.com/news/national...126e25ff7.html



Lets go already!
__________________
Not feeling stimulated yet.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-04-2011, 08:01 AM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by doucanoe View Post
Do I detect a bit of sanity at the DOE?

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-04-2011, 08:42 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Man, the arguments against pipeline construction are getting old.

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-04-2011, 09:08 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Considering that (to the best of my knowledge) TransCanada Pipeline is owned by Bell Canada Enterprises (BCE) I would say go for it. Bell got smart years back and since the telephone part was regulated they formed BCE and gave it owenrship of Bell Canada, so BCE is free to conduct business just like any other Canadian corporation, I believe it was shortly after I came down here that I heard BCE had bought the pipeline company.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-04-2011, 04:12 PM
doucanoe's Avatar
doucanoe doucanoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 462
We could erect a windmill straddling the pipeline ever 100 miles or so just for good measure.
__________________
Not feeling stimulated yet.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-04-2011, 05:15 PM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by piece-itpete View Post
Man, the arguments against pipeline construction are getting old.

Pete
Talk about special interests mucking up the works for everyone. The fact that our country's energy policy must be rubber stamped by the environmental lobby is just sad. Ask the folks in the Southwest right now who are having fun with rolling blackouts.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2011, 06:21 PM
CarlV's Avatar
CarlV CarlV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SF east bay
Posts: 4,456
Ah yes, the dirty crude. It is OK with me as long as it is Texas and not the Chevron Richmond Ca. refinery.
They tried to get one over with a false EIR and lied saying it was only a modernization upgrade. When our Green Party mayor and the not bought councilman along with Citizens For A Better Environment caught on and blocked it via lawsuit. Of course come election time, Chevron spent 300,000 on a character assassination on the mayor and gave the old school bought-and-paid-for opponent 700,000. Just like the health care fiasco, all of a sudden they are a bottomless pit of money when it comes time to get one over.
We are still waiting for an honest proposal because the people sure need work here. But Chevron is quiet except for trying to sue back some of their property taxes.
Quote:
In 2009, Chevron had the distinction of being the state’s largest industrial emitter of greenhouse gases. And 46 percent of the adults and 17 percent of kids in the town have asthma.

But Chevron’s plans for expansion would have included building in new systems so that the Richmond plant could refine heavier crude, which would have meant more pollution for the surrounding communities. The court ruled that Chevon broke the law when they conveniently failed to disclose their plans to refine dirtier oil that would have adverse affects on the community.

“Refineries that have begun the switch to heavier, dirtier crude oil emit up to 58 percent more greenhouse gases per barrel refined as compared wiht the average U.S. refinery,” said Greg Karras, a scientist with CBE said in a press release.
http://colorlines.com/archives/2010/...d_illegal.html

I hate to be a NIMBY about it but Texas government does not seem to care about such things.



Carl
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-04-2011, 06:30 PM
mossbacked's Avatar
mossbacked mossbacked is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 396
Quote:
Originally Posted by doucanoe View Post
We could erect a windmill straddling the pipeline ever 100 miles or so just for good measure.
Yes! And hopefully the obnoxious low frequencies the blades generate will repel any terrorists who may be considering blowing such things up.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-04-2011, 08:05 PM
doucanoe's Avatar
doucanoe doucanoe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 462
Quote:
Originally Posted by mossbacked View Post
Yes! And hopefully the obnoxious low frequencies the blades generate will repel any terrorists who may be considering blowing such things up.

The pipeline or just the windmill?
__________________
Not feeling stimulated yet.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-05-2011, 07:06 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Talk about special interests mucking up the works for everyone. The fact that our country's energy policy must be rubber stamped by the environmental lobby is just sad. Ask the folks in the Southwest right now who are having fun with rolling blackouts.
Mainly because energy generation is in the greedy hands of private industry. When I lived in Ottawa (Ontario Hydro) for 13 years there was one blackout. A transformer the size of an average bedroom blew out. It was replaced with one mounted on a flatbed trailer in 12 hours. The permanent replacement was done without a hitch some time later.

Private industry spend all the profits on shareholders, or in the case of the local one, bad investments, and not on their local plant. BG&E locally has defaced more trees than all the storms and hurricanes have. If they had buried the wires they would not be spending money every year defacing trees. Poor planning.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:02 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.