Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #91  
Old 10-22-2011, 01:22 AM
Bigerik's Avatar
Bigerik Bigerik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Upper Canuckistan
Posts: 2,180
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krazygrrl View Post
Isn't it odd that all those Demcrats that voted for the Iraq war in 2003, including Pelosi, Rangel, Ried, and others, now deny that they did?... How sad! They got the same information that George Bush received, but only Bush lied.. how convenient!
yup, the Dems have a lot to answer for, allowing that crap to happen.
Reply With Quote
  #92  
Old 10-22-2011, 01:27 AM
Fast_Eddie's Avatar
Fast_Eddie Fast_Eddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krazygrrl View Post
Isn't it odd that all those Demcrats that voted for the Iraq war in 2003, including Pelosi, Rangel, Ried, and others, now deny that they did?... How sad! They got the same information that George Bush received, but only Bush lied.. how convenient!
You're avoiding my question. You said "This too, is another illegal act in my view." I'm asking if it is more, less, or the same amount of illegal than every military action the United States has taken in the last 30 years under Democratic or Republican Presidents. Simple question. Yes or no.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
Reply With Quote
  #93  
Old 10-22-2011, 01:51 AM
Fast_Eddie's Avatar
Fast_Eddie Fast_Eddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
We'll get back to this one tomorrow. Off to bed for now.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
Reply With Quote
  #94  
Old 10-22-2011, 04:38 AM
Krazygrrl Krazygrrl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie View Post
You're avoiding my question. You said "This too, is another illegal act in my view." I'm asking if it is more, less, or the same amount of illegal than every military action the United States has taken in the last 30 years under Democratic or Republican Presidents. Simple question. Yes or no.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie View Post
We'll get back to this one tomorrow. Off to bed for now.
I do wish you a pleasant evening.... Remember, it isn't about the degree of illegality, but that it is. I am not a friend of military action, if it is avoidable. The action is Libya, totally owned by Obama, was not only avoidable, but completely unnecessary in my view.
Reply With Quote
  #95  
Old 10-22-2011, 06:57 AM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie View Post
It's a world wide conspiracy. First the people in Tunisia. Then the people in Egypt. Now Lybia. All working together, giving their lives just to make Obama look good. Shoot, even Bin Laden offed himself for Obama. It's that Muslim/Christian black magic Voodoo he learned in Kenya. Only a natural born Kenyan can perform it.

You have no clue the scope of the world wide conspiracy.

Wait, if he's from Kenya, why do the whack jobs think he's Muslim? Aren't they mostly Christians over there?
Reread your second sentence. I think you're onto something.

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #96  
Old 10-22-2011, 09:54 AM
Fast_Eddie's Avatar
Fast_Eddie Fast_Eddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krazygrrl View Post
I do wish you a pleasant evening.... Remember, it isn't about the degree of illegality, but that it is. I am not a friend of military action, if it is avoidable. The action is Libya, totally owned by Obama, was not only avoidable, but completely unnecessary in my view.
Could you please answer the question? You said very clearly again that the limited bombing in Lybia was illegal. Was the invasion of Iraq illegal as well?

I ask these questions simply and directly. You have yet to answer me in kind.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
Reply With Quote
  #97  
Old 10-22-2011, 10:36 AM
Bigerik's Avatar
Bigerik Bigerik is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Upper Canuckistan
Posts: 2,180
Actually, wasn't this Libya thing actually LEGAL, eventually anyway. I thought NATO was providing support to the recognized, legitimate rulers of Libya, in fighting a civil war. Not my first choice of how to use my military, but not illegal.
Reply With Quote
  #98  
Old 10-22-2011, 10:49 AM
Krazygrrl Krazygrrl is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigerik View Post
Actually, wasn't this Libya thing actually LEGAL, eventually anyway. I thought NATO was providing support to the recognized, legitimate rulers of Libya, in fighting a civil war. Not my first choice of how to use my military, but not illegal.
Erik,

The question if military action by the USA is legal or not, does not rest with the UN, but with the Congress. Congress never authorized action in Libya. Obama derived a perceived legitimacy because the UN and the Arab League said it was okay. Obama obviously does not understand that his authority does not come from either of these two bodies. Nor did Obama abide by the War Powers Act. This, is actually an impeachable act - not that he will be impeached though.

As to Iraq, to answer your question Eddie, yes - Congress authorized action. Thus it was a legal action. George Bush sought congressional approval before the action in 2003 and received it. Obama, totally ignored the will of Congress on Libya.

I personal do not agree with either conflict.
Reply With Quote
  #99  
Old 10-22-2011, 10:54 AM
Fast_Eddie's Avatar
Fast_Eddie Fast_Eddie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 3,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Krazygrrl View Post

As to Iraq, to answer your question Eddie, yes - Congress authorized action.
Wait, you're changing the rules. Is it clear and present danger, or congressional authority? So now Iraq was legal, but Viet Nam was not.
__________________
Two days slow. That's what they are.
Reply With Quote
  #100  
Old 10-22-2011, 10:56 AM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigerik View Post
Perfect. Anyone want to put any money on how quickly Libya will now turn Muslim?
With his death imminent, Kahddafi reportedly told his captors that they were violating Muslim law.

There are a number if interesting/troubling ethical questions about the way his actual death came about, but that is an issue for another thread.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.