Mid East policy speech

[flacaltenn]

NoOneReal:

I am ok with that and shouldn't this be on the table?

It has been on the table in SOME form as FinnBow twisted my arm to admit for a long time. But there's a certain diplomatic parsing and lexicon to present that idea. It is NOT as the Pali.Author. wanted it to be a one acre for one acre swap as logic would dictate. Was never intended that way. Anyone who's been there knows how much wasteland surrounds the habitable parts.

When you just blurt out "pre- 1967 borders" as a starting point, it just shows that you are oversimplifying the concept and avoiding all that special diplomacy that it takes to sell an international solution..

For instance, it comes AFTER some other important pre-conditions, such as identifying who SPEAKS for the Palis? -- recognizing the rights of the other parties -- and deciding on the luncheon menu...