Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #41  
Old 02-11-2011, 10:33 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
Just a couple of points;

SS funds itself, it was the pols who stole the money and left IOUs
Self funding is a trend that is in the process if reversing itself. We're close right now to having 2 workers' payroll taxes funding one SS retiree. Within the next 10 -15 years that is expected to become a 1:1 ratio. By the mid-2030's, the fund is expected to have more liabilities than income.

Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
Medicare probably comes close to funding itself, I am sure that I am not the only one who pays over $1100 a year for a flu shot. They have raised the level of contribution since I joined. Funny part is that it was a Republican administration that insisted I take SS at 65 although I would have preferred to wait until I retired at 73 simply because they got most all of it back in taxes.
I doubt you'll find many "righties" staffing your average SS office.


Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
In case no one noticed a goodly number of the countries where we have military bases would just as soon we went home, Okinawa for example. The idea that we are the world's police force is a legend in our own minds.
There has been a history of Japanese protests in Okinawa, but I certainly doubt the Japanese government would be in favor of the US closing down the facilities there.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 02-11-2011, 10:49 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post



I doubt you'll find many "righties" staffing your average SS office.


.
of course not you have to pass a test

besides it is clear that the GOP would throw them in the street so big business could profit from paying someone else half and pocket the difference.

only the radical right votes against their own best interest
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 02-11-2011, 11:28 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
There has been a history of Japanese protests in Okinawa, but I certainly doubt the Japanese government would be in favor of the US closing down the facilities there.
Actually it is the Marine Corps that refuses to close it.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 02-11-2011, 11:50 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
Actually it is the Marine Corps that refuses to close it.
No, that's not what I mean. There is resistance by the US Military to move the base. The Okinawan locals just don't want the base in their backyard. They want it moved. The US and Japan have had an agreement in place since the mid 2000's to keep the base where it is, so there's a contractual issue as well.

My point was that the Japanese leadership doesn't want an absence of a US military presence in the region - more to your prior point of the US being a "world police force."
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 02-11-2011, 12:01 PM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
of course not you have to pass a test
I guess no one on the right could score low enough!
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 02-11-2011, 12:05 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by noonereal View Post
of course not you have to pass a test

besides it is clear that the GOP would throw them in the street so big business could profit from paying someone else half and pocket the difference.

only the radical right votes against their own best interest
As to this test, are the instructions written on the bottom of the heel?

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 02-11-2011, 12:11 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
Just a couple of points;

SS funds itself, it was the pols who stole the money and left IOUs

Medicare probably comes close to funding itself, I am sure that I am not the only one who pays over $1100 a year for a flu shot. They have raised the level of contribution since I joined. Funny part is that it was a Republican administration that insisted I take SS at 65 although I would have preferred to wait until I retired at 73 simply because they got most all of it back in taxes..

In case no one noticed a goodly number of the countries where we have military bases would just as soon we went home, Okinawa for example. The idea that we are the world's police force is a legend in our own minds.
Don't feel bad, we're paying around 16K per year and I don't even get the flu shot. And if I do get sick I take Fish Mox.

To be fair, my wife does use it, but her tab is nowhere close to 16K.

Blood suckers.

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 02-11-2011, 12:19 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
I doubt you'll find many "righties" staffing your average SS office.

Because a "rightie" would still see SS as a "hammock" for deadweights rather than a benefit for those who have worked their entire lives. Until he finds himself drawing from it, of course. Then, it's his money and he'd better damn well see that check right on time. Isn't that how it works?

There has been a history of Japanese protests in Okinawa, but I certainly doubt the Japanese government would be in favor of the US closing down the facilities there.
Right. Because then they would have to pay to defend themselves. Right now, they have people like you duped into thinking it's our patriotic duty to pay for it. Buff chested militaristic pride in being a "superpower" and all of that childish nonsense.

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa

Last edited by BlueStreak; 02-11-2011 at 12:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 02-11-2011, 01:00 PM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
The first place I'd look is at actual government payroll outlay.

Staff cuts, pay cuts, benefit cuts, unneccessary divisions....

Like a business.

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 02-11-2011, 01:24 PM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueStreak View Post
Right. Because then they would have to pay to defend themselves. Right now, they have people like you duped into thinking it's our patriotic duty to pay for it. Buff chested militaristic pride in being a "superpower" and all of that childish nonsense.

Dave
So, you don't think its in the USA's interests to have a military presence so that we're capable of managing our interests in the region, support Taiwan (as we're bound to do by treaty) in case of attack by China? Do you think Japan could defend themselves against China it push came to shove (not an unrealistic scenario given the history of these two countries)?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.