Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #131  
Old 12-09-2010, 07:31 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Explain that to Mr Reid. He was quoted in August as saying, when welcoming the troops home in August, that they played a valuable role in successfully defending American interest in Iraq.
So it appears that your identification of remarks as anti-American consists of political statements with which you disagreed, or diplomatic policy with which you disagreed. That would put you squarely within the Cheney camp of classifying dissent or criticism of foreign policy as traitorous. Ironic that so many on the right were claiming to want to return to constitutional principles, but the most basic constitutional principle such as free speech it considered traitorous when it is not kept within a well-defined political view. That's sad.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #132  
Old 12-09-2010, 08:05 PM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fast_Eddie View Post
it is widely agreed that the Stimulus worked and we would be in far worse shape right now had President Obama not done it. In fact, I believe part of the motivation for the compromise deal on taxes and unemployment is to get a second, back door stimulus passed, knowing that another spending measure has no hope.
If the Stimulus worked, then why did we need a second (or is this the 3rd) stimulus? Why is unemployment still sitting above 9%, and why are we extending unemployment benefits if the stimulus bills have worked? Why is Obama compromising on a centerpiece of his campaign - getting rid of the Bush - era tax cuts - if the stimulus bills worked?
Reply With Quote
  #133  
Old 12-09-2010, 08:15 PM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
So it appears that your identification of remarks as anti-American consists of political statements with which you disagreed, or diplomatic policy with which you disagreed. That would put you squarely within the Cheney camp of classifying dissent or criticism of foreign policy as traitorous. Ironic that so many on the right were claiming to want to return to constitutional principles, but the most basic constitutional principle such as free speech it considered traitorous when it is not kept within a well-defined political view. That's sad.

Regards,

D-Ray
Incorrect, my friend. And don't be sad, there's more. Reid and his comments are just a thread in the tapestry.
Reply With Quote
  #134  
Old 12-09-2010, 08:15 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Explain that to Mr Reid. He was quoted in August as saying, when welcoming the troops home in August, that they played a valuable role in successfully defending American interest in Iraq.
He's wrong (as was Dubya). We have no national interests there (other than oil).

Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
If the Stimulus worked, then why did we need a second (or is this the 3rd) stimulus? Why is unemployment still sitting above 9%, and why are we extending unemployment benefits if the stimulus bills have worked? Why is Obama compromising on a centerpiece of his campaign - getting rid of the Bush - era tax cuts - if the stimulus bills worked?
It worked, just not well enough to make up for the mess that Dubya left behind - starting two wars and extending Medicare benefits while cutting taxes and ignoring the warning signs of the mortgage debacle. BTW, he campaigned on getting rid of the Bush era tax cuts for those earning more than $250K. That's exactly what he would have done had the GOP not placed their roadblocks.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #135  
Old 12-09-2010, 08:25 PM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
If the Stimulus worked, then why did we need a second (or is this the 3rd) stimulus? Why is unemployment still sitting above 9%, and why are we extending unemployment benefits if the stimulus bills have worked? Why is Obama compromising on a centerpiece of his campaign - getting rid of the Bush - era tax cuts - if the stimulus bills worked?
Simple. It prevented a depresion. It would have helped more if the first one hadn't had to be cut back. I don't think the Bush-Era tax cuts were the centerpiece of his campaign. He did campaign on middle class tax relief. The deal includes an extension of the stimulus tax cuts, and a reduction in social security withholding, as well as extension of the middle class portion of the tax plan, that he had campaigned on keeping. The GOP was willing to screw up the economy, cost middle income taxpayers thousands of dollars per family, and put unemployed workers out on the street, all so their millionaire buddies got to have their taxes cut.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #136  
Old 12-10-2010, 12:05 AM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
So it appears that your identification of remarks as anti-American consists of political statements with which you disagreed, or diplomatic policy with which you disagreed. That would put you squarely within the Cheney camp of classifying dissent or criticism of foreign policy as traitorous. Ironic that so many on the right were claiming to want to return to constitutional principles, but the most basic constitutional principle such as free speech it considered traitorous when it is not kept within a well-defined political view. That's sad.

Regards,

D-Ray
So you've noticed that too?

Kind of like when you offend a Liberals beliefs it's okay because your standing up to "Political Correctness".

Offend a right wingers beliefs and you're "un-American".

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #137  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:20 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
'course, that the context of Reid's remarks when he made them, was it?

. His campaign said "Senator Reid’s comment was in agreement with General Petraeus’ assessment that the Iraq War could not be won by military force alone and that a political solution was also needed as part of a two-part strategy — which President Bush refused to pursue.”

Yeah, right. I seemed to have missed the part where Patraeus said "We lost."

Seems to me that "Could not be won" leaves only two other possibilities "Stalemate or lost" or are you really that stupid.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #138  
Old 12-10-2010, 07:55 AM
d-ray657's Avatar
d-ray657 d-ray657 is offline
Loyal Opposition
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Johnson County, Kansas
Posts: 14,401
Ya know, this all seems less troubling after sitting here for an hour or so with Neil Young playing.

Hello cowgirl in the sand
Is this place at your command
Can I stay here for a while
Can I see your sweet sweet smile

Old enough now to change your name
When so many love you is it the same?
It's the woman in you
That makes you want to play this game.

Regards,

D-Ray
__________________
Then I'll get on my knees and pray,
We won't get fooled again; Don't get fooled again
Reply With Quote
  #139  
Old 12-10-2010, 08:54 AM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
Quote:
Originally Posted by d-ray657 View Post
Ya know, this all seems less troubling after sitting here for an hour or so with Neil Young playing.

Hello cowgirl in the sand
Is this place at your command
Can I stay here for a while
Can I see your sweet sweet smile

Old enough now to change your name
When so many love you is it the same?
It's the woman in you
That makes you want to play this game.

Regards,

D-Ray
Sounds to me like Neil just wants to get a nut.

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #140  
Old 12-10-2010, 09:08 AM
piece-itpete's Avatar
piece-itpete piece-itpete is offline
What, me worry?
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Land of the burning river
Posts: 21,227
Bad squirrel! Bad!

Reid's the worst kind of idiot - a smart sneaky one. Perfect for chairing a large international corporation or perhaps leading the Senate. I suspect he was a teacher at Obama's madrassas.

I watch a lot of international news. A couple of days ago I saw an interview with an Iraqi lady. She had brought her kid to a playground.

The modern playground was full of children and mothers, playing. Anyone that thinks things aren't getting better over there isn't paying close enough attention.

Pete
__________________
"America is still a land of promise, especially during a political campaign."
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
hang the traitor


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:54 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.