Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 03-18-2025, 06:09 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
DOW and NASDAQ slide again today. Good job, dillweed d'Rumph.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 03-20-2025, 07:51 AM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,540
Oligarchs get to live well even in shithole countries. In fact, they get to live like royalty.
__________________
The first casualty of war is the truth.
[ Greek dramatist Aeschylus ]
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 03-20-2025, 09:30 AM
Noogies's Avatar
Noogies Noogies is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: As far West as I can get.
Posts: 726
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickeyM View Post
Oligarchs get to live well even in shithole countries. In fact, they get to live like royalty.
Russia being Example #1.
__________________
Tom Selleck wants to steal your house!
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 03-22-2025, 11:19 AM
Chicks Chicks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Posts: 14,448
Economics Is Not Trump’s Strong Suit
https://www.aei.org/economics/econom...s-strong-suit/

To put it politely...
__________________
"In a time of deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -
George Orwell
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 03-23-2025, 09:29 PM
Noogies's Avatar
Noogies Noogies is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: As far West as I can get.
Posts: 726
What I'd like to know is, what's Howard Lutnick's 94-year-old mother-in-law doing suckin' on the the government teat in the first place?

Freeloading old bat!
__________________
Tom Selleck wants to steal your house!
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 03-23-2025, 11:13 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,930
She's got tons of money. That's why she wouldn't care if the social security didn't show up.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 03-24-2025, 12:49 AM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noogies View Post
What I'd like to know is, what's Howard Lutnick's 94-year-old mother-in-law doing suckin' on the the government teat in the first place?

Freeloading old bat!
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
She's got tons of money. That's why she wouldn't care if the social security didn't show up.
Hell, if I had a billionaire grandson I wouldn't worry about missing a SS check either.
__________________
The first casualty of war is the truth.
[ Greek dramatist Aeschylus ]
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 03-24-2025, 12:56 PM
Noogies's Avatar
Noogies Noogies is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: As far West as I can get.
Posts: 726
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
She's got tons of money. That's why she wouldn't care if the social security didn't show up.
Quote:
Originally Posted by RickeyM View Post
Hell, if I had a billionaire grandson I wouldn't worry about missing a SS check either.
I know, right?

My original point -- albeit possibly arrived at by a circuitous route -- was that rich people shouldn't be receiving social security. Means testing, anyone? Seems like a good way to trim expenses.
__________________
Tom Selleck wants to steal your house!

Last edited by Noogies; 03-25-2025 at 12:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 03-24-2025, 08:06 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Noogies View Post
I know, right?

My original point -- albeit possibly arrived a by a circuitous route -- was that rich people shouldn't be receiving social security. Means testing, anyone? Seems like a good way to trim expenses.
It would trim relatively little in expenses, while introducing a potentially-problematic complication into the claims process. The only change necessary is to increase the cap on earnings subject to social security tax. I would make it a floating cap, adjusted automatically every year so prospective revenues hopefully match prospective expenses. Should that fail, Treasury on the hook for the shortfall. As it is anyway....
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 03-25-2025, 12:56 AM
Noogies's Avatar
Noogies Noogies is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: As far West as I can get.
Posts: 726
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
It would trim relatively little in expenses, while introducing a potentially-problematic complication into the claims process.
Got it -- actually cheaper to pay everyone, even those who don't need or deserve it.

You're such a pragmatist.
__________________
Tom Selleck wants to steal your house!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.