Kamala Harris For President!

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by RickeyM

Randy Rainbow says...

The lawyer or the conman?

Summing it up nicely, as usual.

He was a Conman when he campaigned in 2016, now he is a Conman and a Felon.

Make America Great Again, Elect a Felon for President.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

No, I didn't say that at all.

I am agreeing with the NY Times that she has not articulated her position on key issues and has not made her self available to the media. You can try to spin it, but that just tells me that either you can't read, or you don't want to acknowledge basic facts. I don't really care which, so I'll let you decide.

Ahhh, the NY Post* is the only one that has been saying that. Oh brother, SMH. Poor whell, nothing to argue against Harris with. Because he's not privy to he policies or positions, she must not have any. Worse yet, she must be "properly programmed" before she can speak. "Properly programmed" by whom? The evil DNC perhaps? I keep wondering why the people who didn't vote for Biden, weren't going to vote for Biden and sure as hell aren't going to vote for Kamala Harris care about such things. Poor whell, he like many Repubs was counting on tRump rolling over Biden then whups, thud.



*EDIT: whell is spouting from the NY Times.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

He was a Conman when he campaigned in 2016, now he is a Conman and a Felon.

Make America Great Again, Elect a Felon for President.

I like how partway through the placard for tRump was changed from Conman to Felon to acknowledge that fact.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

No, I didn't say that at all.

I am agreeing with the NY Times that she has not articulated her position on key issues and has not made her self available to the media. You can try to spin it, but that just tells me that either you can't read, or you don't want to acknowledge basic facts. I don't really care which, so I'll let you decide.

You simply can't get it through your head that the key issue in this election is democracy vs autocracy and the danger that Trump represents to our democratic republic.

I'm agreeing with the NY Times observation that Harris has not articulated the her positions and has not made herself available. Are they "Maga malcontents" too?

No, they're the press, exactly as I said. I said "...the objective of the Harris campaign is to win, not to please the press or MAGA malcontents like you."

Your desperation is showing.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

Ah, so she's a blank slate with no opinions of her own on key issues, and must wait for the Democrat convention in order to be properly programmed. Got it.

You can't seem to get it thru your head that she's not running her campaign to please you. Is narcissism a MAGA trait?

[whell]

Originally Posted by RickeyM

Ahhh, the NY Post is the only one that has been saying that.

Wrong again. See my post 242. It is coming from the NY Times.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

You simply can't get it through your head that the key issue in this election is democracy vs autocracy and the danger that Trump represents to our democratic republic.

No, they're the press, exactly as I said. I said "...the objective of the Harris campaign is to win, not to please the press or MAGA malcontents like you."

Oh, I've gotten it through my head that the election is about that for you and yours. I think you're barking up the wrong tree, tilting at windmills, insert your favorite bromide here. But, hey, you do you, Finn.

Thanks for confirming that you believe that avoiding the press is a Harris campaign strategy.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

Wrong again. See my post 242. It is coming from the NY Times.

I stand corrected. FWIW it's not that it's the NY Times that said it you singled them out like they were the only ones spouting that. They aren't. DJ & JD are spouting the same thing too

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

Ah, so she's a blank slate with no opinions of her own on key issues, and must wait for the Democrat convention in order to be properly programmed. Got it.

So please answer this, why didn't the Republican party put forth a platform in 2020? Because Trump had nothing to say? Figures, all he can do is talk shit.

The Republican National Committee (RNC) issued a resolution stating that the convention would adjourn without adopting a new platform, indicating that the party would continue to support President Trump's "America-first agenda" without a detailed policy framework. This approach effectively allowed the party to avoid potential internal conflicts over platform issues, which had been a concern leading up to the convention.

America First or Trump First? And he lost badly, very badly. GA, AZ, NV?
And did he lose so badly because he did not put forth a platform?
Only thing of significance he said is "if I don't win, its because the election is rigged" (paraphrasing).

And you want to know what piques me with your Bozo?
The guy loses the popular vote in both 2016 & 2020, yet brags about getting the most votes of any Republican candidate.
As the saying goes, coming in second is losing. What lack of a good education does to a person.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/did...S9CiT5s3VWJN1g

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

Oh, I've gotten it through my head that the election is about that for you and yours. I think you're barking up the wrong tree, tilting at windmills, insert your favorite bromide here. But, hey, you do you, Finn.

Thanks for confirming that you believe that avoiding the press is a Harris campaign strategy.

(pssst Project 2025)