Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
It wasn't my definition. It was the definition provided by the Oxford English Language Dictionary. Don't like it? Take it up with them. While you're at it, you may wish to check out their definition for euphemism as you don't seem to know what it means either.
|
Keep it up and you'll reach "king butthole" status in no time.
Euphemism is used perfectly in this context: a mild or indirect word or expression substituted for one considered to be too harsh or blunt when referring to something unpleasant or embarrassing.
Socializm is unpleasant in any form. The myriad terms that are substituted for it, such as "Social Democrat" are used in an effort to make socializm sound more palatable. Hell, the word "socializm" itself is a euphemism for the less pleasant aspects and outcomes associated with its application.
Congratulations on finding a source that attempts to convince folks that there are degrees of "socializm", where one is "bad" - do you call it "pure socializm" - because an autocrat is in charge. This is contrasted with "less bad socializm" - you know, the type where folks are supposedly happy - like Social Democracy. I guess that's because - as you like to point out - the word "democracy" is part of the title. However, as you also like to point out, it doesn't mean that your source is right.
By the way, if socializm is so great, why did the intrepid admins set up the forum to do this when someone types the word: so************************m?
To test your definition of socializm, let me ask you very simple questions:
- Can socializm exist within a society absent an "authoritarian leader".
- Can democrat forms of citizen participation - such as voting or running for elections - exist under where a leader of a society is an "authoritarian"?
If you answered yes to both, then you understand why your simplistic definition is intellectually dishonest.
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
WTF? I provided you an informative article from Encyclopedia Britannica that defined and explained protofascism (which they said was also known by the term semi-fascism). Don't like it? Take it up with them. If you don't like their definition pull up the Google search results and dive in. In addition to Britannica, Merriam-Webster and Wikipedia also provide definitions- take your pick. For that matter, there are entire books on the subject. Here's one and here's another.
Once again, just because you don't know about something doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
It has an objective meaning (see above) and I used the word protofascist long before Biden correctly used the term to describe "extreme MAGA" folks.
|
Good for you, you found a word you're happy with. A claim that it is "sometimes used interchangeably" with another word doesn't mean that the two words share the same definition. It simply means that the person using the term - in this case "semi-fascist" - is imputing or suggesting a possible meaning. The fact remains that there are a lot of opinions about what the term semi-fascist might mean, but no objective definition. And, to that end, you still have not provided specific examples of actual behavior.
Similarly, I can go to a thesaurus and look up "socializm". Here's what I get:
1.
Any of various theories or systems of social organization in which the means of producing and distributing goods is owned collectively or by a centralized government that often plans and controls the economy.
2. The stage in Marxist-Leninist theory intermediate between capitalism and communism, in which the means of production are collectively owned but a completely classless society has not yet been achieved.
So "socializm" is an inclusive word that includes all the little euphemistic feel-good terms like "social democracy". Funny, I don't see a damn thing in that description about authoritarian leaders. But, I will allow that autocracy is one possible type of leadership in a socializtic society.
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow
Schadenfreude is a powerful force...
|
Yep, it is. Its also usually exhibited or felt by small people who get their jollies by tearing other folks down.