FAKE NEWS EXPOSED: A Service of PoliticalChat.com

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

Thank you for avoiding the central question and substituting your own bullshit.

Beg to pardon but I don't engage in games of chess with winged fowl of the pigeon persuasion. Translation: I wasn't talking to you spanky, I was talking about you. After all, as you called it, I'm a genius

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by finnbow

How appropriate. I love it, I'm stealing it.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

So, you're admitting that you moved the goalposts?

You're the one who contented that Biden wasn't involved. All I did was point out how he and his administration was involved - even legitimized - such activity. So, stop crying about it.

[whell]

Originally Posted by RickeyM

Beg to pardon but I don't engage in games of chess with winged fowl of the pigeon persuasion. Translation: I wasn't talking to you spanky, I was talking about you. After all, as you called it, I'm a genius

...and you practice genius-level evasion.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

You're the one who contented that Biden wasn't involved. All I did was point out how he and his administration was involved - even legitimized - such activity. So, stop crying about it.

You did no such thing. You made a lame attempt at "whataboutism" that fell flat on its ass as it had absolutely no merit.

Indeed, I challenge you to find a single instance where Biden has promoted, encouraged or threatened political violence, something Trump and the GOP do routinely.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by whell

Biden's DOJ let it happen, did nothing to discourage the protests outside the homes of the SCOTUS justices' homes, even though such protests may have been illegal. So, YES, Biden was involved.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/05/12/polit...and/index.html

a. In the link above it's reported that the demonstrations were peaceful and isn't this covered as a First Amendment right? After all abortion is supported by a majority of the American people.

In recent days, protesters have held peaceful demonstrations outside the homes of multiple conservative Supreme Court justices following publication of a draft Supreme Court majority opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade. In a statement Wednesday evening, a Justice Department spokesperson said Garland was continuing to be briefed on the “security matters related” to the justices and that he had directed the US Marshals Service to provide assistance to the separate police agency that provides security to the Supreme Court.

Nearly a year after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, U.S. opinions about that consequential decision remain largely unchanged in this latest poll. A majority of U.S. adults – 59 percent – still say they oppose the justices’ decision, which removed federal protections for many reproductive health care services, while another 40 percent of Americans agree with the nation’s highest court.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/health/...ons-poll-shows

b. Trump posted Obama's home address on his site and any comment on that? What was the intent or expectation?

[Rajoo]

TV meteorologist quits after receiving threats and harassment over climate change coverage

The decision was not easy, Gloninger told the Washington Post, but in a tweet announcing his exit, he cited a “death threat stemming from my climate coverage” which he said resulted in post-traumatic stress. He also mentioned the need to address family health issues.

The emails from the viewer, according to screenshots Gloninger’s tweeted, called the meteorologist a “liberal conspiracy” theorist and told him to “go east and drown from the ice cap melting.”

https://www.cnn.com/2023/06/23/weath...ate/index.html

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

...and you practice genius-level evasion.

Awww spanky's upset because I won't engage in his bullshitting for entertainment postings.

PS; flattery will get you nowhere.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by finnbow

You did no such thing. You made a lame attempt at "whataboutism" that fell flat on its ass as it had absolutely no merit.

Let's give him a participation trophy anyway.

[Chicks]

Matthew Gertz @MattGertz

Views for "Tucker Carlson on Twitter" posts (assume the number of people who actually viewed the videos is much much lower).

Announcement: 137.1M
Ep. 1: 120M
Ep. 2: 60.6M
Ep. 3 (Trump indicted): 104.1M
Ep. 4: 32.4M
Ep. 5: 17.3M
Ep. 6: 32M
Ep. 7: 15.4M
Ep. 8: 8.6M

———————————

Downward spiral to irrelevance. Buh-bye, Fucker!