FAKE NEWS EXPOSED: A Service of PoliticalChat.com

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Only in MAGAWorld does a note that something "may warrant additional action" constitute government coercion (Oxford defines coercion as "the practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats.").

So, a request that something "may warrant additional action" is coercion but overt threats made to Georgia Sec of State to engage in election fraud is not coercion, but a "perfect phone call." And you wonder why normal people don't want MAGAMorons picking out school books.

So you ignored everything else in the post, formulated a response around that one sentence, used it out of context, and then wove in something about Trump to deflect.

Flag on the field. Personal foul: fallacy overuse!

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

So you ignored everything else in the post, formulated a response around that one sentence, used it out of context, and then wove in something about Trump to deflect.

Flag on the field. Personal foul: fallacy overuse!

Let it be a hint. Your way too long-winded and the more long-winded you are, the more you're trying to recover from an untenable position.

The bottom line is that these two MAGA AG's and their compliant MAGA judge are gonna ultimately lose this thing. Bigly. Like everything else MAGA, it's performative nonsense intended to rile the rubes. It's worked on you. Enjoy it while it lasts.

Meanwhile, Elon Musk's ongoing efforts to cater to the wingnut conspiracy theory crowd (with which he is active participant) and Russian trolls may render this whole court case moot. Twitter may be dead and gone by the time the case is finally adjudicated. I suppose that says something about Twitter's previous curation policy as opposed to Musk's current one (which is rapidly driving Twitter into the ditch and has made Musk the biggest financial loser in history).

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Doxxing with an intent to intimidate a former President, particularly when a guy armed to the teeth shows up immediately thereafter. Whell squawked loudly about the armed clown in a SCOTUS judge's neighborhood, but is oddly silent when Dear Leader calls out the troops to threaten Obama. I don't recall Biden doxxing Kavanaugh.

Nothing odd about it. Hypocritical as hell, but not odd, considering....

[whell]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

Please answer to Ricky's post.

Originally Posted by Rajoo

A group of wacked out ill educated moms led by the nose by alt right wing of a Fascist party cannot be allowed to censor library books. If these wacko moms do not want their children to be educated in a conventional public system, home school them.

About time we had Christian madrassas so that these children be brainwashed in a controlled setting.

1) These parents are not deciding what Ricky's kids are ready for. If Ricky wants his kids to read about blow jobs and whether or not to swallow, then Ricky can buy the book for them or get it from the public library. See? Easy peasy.

2) What is your source for the statement that these moms are whacked out and ill educated? Does "education in the public school system" really require that kids have access to books about blow jobs and whether or not to swallow? Is a book with content like this required, in your opinion:

Me and Earl and the Dying Girl by Jesse Andrews (challenged in 26 districts):

“Do you even know how to eat pussy?” “Uh, not really.” “Papa Gaines never sat you down, said, Son, one day you’re gonna have to eat the pussy.” “No. But he did teach me how to eat a butthole.” … The Greg S. Gaines Three-Step Method of Seduction 1. Lurch into the girl’s bedroom pretending to be a zombie. 2. Go in for a fist pound. 3. Suggest that you habitually masturbate all over pillows.

Is the case you're making that content like this must be available to kids in a public school and that making them available is an essential part of a "conventional public (school ) system"? If so, then please explain why it's necessary.

Also, if Jesse Andrews were a noted conservative writer, the book would be attacked by the left as containing content that objectifies and demeans women.

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Doxxing with an intent to intimidate a former President, particularly when a guy armed to the teeth shows up immediately thereafter. Whell squawked loudly about the armed clown in a SCOTUS judge's neighborhood, but is oddly silent when Dear Leader calls out the troops to threaten Obama. I don't recall Biden doxxing Kavanaugh.

You're so unbelievably full of shit. I spend lots of time here commenting on all kinds of topics. If I didn't happen to comment on that one, you might have considered asking me what I thought about it.

Instead, you post some passive-aggressive crap as shown above.

Biden doesn't need to doxx any SCOTUS justices. He outsources that to this human debris: https://www.ruthsent.us/

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Let it be a hint. Your way too long-winded and the more long-winded you are, the more you're trying to recover from an untenable position.
.

You're projecting again. Trying to recover is exactly what you were doing when you were busy overloading your posts with fallacious responses.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by whell

You're so unbelievably full of shit. I spend lots of time here commenting on all kinds of topics. If I didn't happen to comment on that one, you might have considered asking me what I thought about it.

Instead, you post some passive-aggressive crap as shown above.

Biden doesn't need to doxx any SCOTUS justices. He outsources that to this human debris: https://www.ruthsent.us/

Do you have any proof that Biden was involved in this? Your desperation to win an argument, any argument is pretty sad. You stew in MAGA lies and get all butt-hurt when someone challenges your latest parroted nonsense.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

So you ignored everything else in the post, formulated a response around that one sentence, used it out of context, and then wove in something about Trump to deflect.

Flag on the field. Personal foul: fallacy overuse!

Pot meet kettle, LOL.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Do you have any proof that Biden was involved in this? Your desperation to win an argument, any argument is pretty sad. You stew in MAGA lies and get all butt-hurt when someone challenges your latest parroted nonsense.

Allegations equal facts, that's how he/they roll.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by whell

1) These parents are not deciding what Rickey's kids are ready for. If Rickey wants his kids to read about blow jobs and whether or not to swallow, then Rickey can buy the book for them or get it from the public library. See? Easy peasy.

2) What is your source for the statement that these moms are whacked out and ill educated? Does "education in the public school system" really require that kids have access to books about blow jobs and whether or not to swallow? Is a book with content like this required, in your opinion:

Bullshit arguments as usual, LOL. The books Fascist Moms For Liberty and the like want out go far beyond sexual topics. They're afraid of their younglings learning about historical racism in particular along with accurate history in general and not the Whitewashed history lessons they're comfortable with. Most of the books on these topics aren't required but merely available in the library for those interested. Seems like the neo-fascists among us aren't comfortable even with that.