Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #381  
Old 04-06-2023, 11:14 AM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 15,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by whell View Post
Let's solve one issue at a time.

If these shootings have a pattern, if the shooters have a pattern, then let's find solutions around that angle.
OK by me.

Shooting have a pattern? Yes, they involve a gun.

Shooters have a pattern? Yes, they us a gun.

So what is the common denominator? Gun.

Solution: Get rid of guns.
__________________
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #382  
Old 04-06-2023, 01:25 PM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,540
While the chances of that happening don't exist banning certain types of weapons with certain capabilities should be an achievable goal.
__________________
The first casualty of war is the truth.
[ Greek dramatist Aeschylus ]
Reply With Quote
  #383  
Old 04-06-2023, 02:26 PM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,936
One avenue that is overlooked by many. Is the violence in film, TV programing video games.

With the vast amount of hours spent and dollars in this country it has to be having an effect on society. Some of the top grossing film and games are very violent and our children are being exposed at a very early age. Toy guns an example of a gift for many years.
Reply With Quote
  #384  
Old 04-06-2023, 11:59 PM
Mark B Mark B is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Minnesota Iron Range
Posts: 702
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerets View Post
One avenue that is overlooked by many. Is the violence in film, TV programing video games.

With the vast amount of hours spent and dollars in this country it has to be having an effect on society. Some of the top grossing film and games are very violent and our children are being exposed at a very early age. Toy guns an example of a gift for many years.
All that is true for virtually every First World country, but the United States alone of those countries suffers from a scourge of mass murders committed using assault weapons.
Reply With Quote
  #385  
Old 04-07-2023, 05:50 AM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,936
Agreed, the point being from me was we start from this premises perspectives. Violence against others as comfortable even enjoyable entertainment.

Then add the easy access to firearms without any real oversights. Regulations enforced in other countries with it seems flavorful results. Other countries must have different view towards community and responsibilities. Over profits for the sellers of deaths, destruction and heartache.

This country is losing it common bond of community. Evolving, or migrating into separate camps unable to communicate respectfully.

Will state again I'm for the restriction of weapons now labeled as Assault. Being a Realist think steps of regulations to include registrations background checks training requiring insurance is the path forward.

Allow ownership just make it a "Well Regulated" one. Then if or when this is shown to be insufficient removal would be warranted.
Reply With Quote
  #386  
Old 04-07-2023, 07:27 AM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,348
I think abandoning the pliable term "assault" for more specific criteria, say, high capacity/ rapid fire combat/tactical type firearm weaponry. The sort designed for high rate of warfare suited sustained rapid firepower not normally used for hunting and target shooting.
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
Reply With Quote
  #387  
Old 04-07-2023, 07:36 AM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,936
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980 View Post
I think abandoning the pliable term "assault" for more specific criteria, say, high capacity/ rapid fire combat/tactical type firearm weaponry. The sort designed for high rate of warfare suited sustained rapid firepower not normally used for hunting and target shooting.
Right, Pistols need to be in any legislation, regulation put into force.
Reply With Quote
  #388  
Old 04-07-2023, 07:42 AM
GChief's Avatar
GChief GChief is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Location: Isle Of Wight Co Va
Posts: 362
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pio1980 View Post
I think abandoning the pliable term "assault" for more specific criteria, say, high capacity/ rapid fire combat/tactical type firearm weaponry. The sort designed for high rate of warfare suited sustained rapid firepower not normally used for hunting and target shooting.
This ^^^
Its not about the scary looking weapon, they all shoot popular hunting rounds.

Which below would be banned with the current "Assault Weapons" frenzy. Banning either gun would be meaningless. But which would be banned in the current climate.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Hunting Rifle.jpg (7.2 KB, 3 views)
File Type: jpg Assualt Weapon.jpg (9.3 KB, 3 views)
Reply With Quote
  #389  
Old 04-07-2023, 08:12 AM
RickeyM RickeyM is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2020
Posts: 7,540
If the first one were limited to a five round clip I think the argument of "I like it for hunting" would evaporate. How much of that extra gear is needed for varmint shootin'?
__________________
The first casualty of war is the truth.
[ Greek dramatist Aeschylus ]
Reply With Quote
  #390  
Old 04-07-2023, 08:17 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by GChief View Post
This ^^^
Its not about the scary looking weapon, they all shoot popular hunting rounds.

Which below would be banned with the current "Assault Weapons" frenzy. Banning either gun would be meaningless. But which would be banned in the current climate.
Hmmm...how would you feel about talk of 'scary-looking regulation' and 'current gun-ownership frenzy?'

We are agreeing that a good definition of what weapons should be more regulated is wanted. Do you have specific suggestions to improve on "high capacity/rapid fire?"
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:01 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.