Election Fraud

[RickeyM]

Musk: Zelensky could start WW111.

Sure, all he has to do is start lobbing nukes into Russia. Oh wait...

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

A very good sign.
Fox Tucker Carlson was the only major platform which gave prominence to the recent Seymour Hersh take on Nordstream2.

Musk: Zelensky could start WW111.

While every other analyst (which Hersch is not) called his article complete bullshit. Hersh went off the rails long ago. You sure have an affinity for discredited wingnuts as long as their wingnuttery serves Putin.

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by bobabode

It is generaly good manners to provide a link instead of making people search for it, Don.


/[/url]

Indeed!

I apologize.

[Mark B]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

A very good sign.
Fox Tucker Carlson was the only major platform which gave prominence to the recent Seymour Hersh take on Nordstream2.

Musk: Zelensky could start WW111.

Not criticism of you for posting this Donny, but Musk is a fool, and possibly a tool.

[Pio1980]

Originally Posted by Mark B

Not criticism of you for posting this Donny, but Musk is a fool, and possibly a tool.

Both true.

[Rajoo]

Originally Posted by Pio1980

Both true.

Agreed. A fool for buying Twitter at $44B and tool for trolling on Twitter posting absolute nonsense.

[bobabode]

'As Trump Inquiry Continues, Republicans Seek Oversight of Georgia Prosecutors'
The proposals are part of a broader push by conservative lawmakers around the country to rein in district attorneys whom they consider too liberal. NY Times

"ATLANTA — To Fani T. Willis, the district attorney in Atlanta, several bills in the Georgia legislature that would make it easier to remove local prosecutors are racist and perhaps retaliatory for her ongoing investigation of former President Donald J. Trump.

To the Republican sponsors of the bills, they are simply a way to ensure that prosecutors enforce the laws of the state, whether they agree with them or not.

Two of the measures under consideration would create a new state oversight board that could punish or remove prosecutors for loosely defined reasons, including “willful misconduct.” A third would sharply reduce the number of signatures required to seek a recall of a district attorney.

The proposals are part of a broader push by conservative lawmakers around the country to rein in prosecutors whom they consider too liberal, and who in some cases are refusing to prosecute low-level drug crimes or enforce strict new anti-abortion laws.

Gov. Ron DeSantis of Florida last year suspended a Democratic prosecutor in the Tampa area, Andrew Warren, after Mr. Warren said, among other things, that he would not prosecute anyone seeking abortions. The Republican-controlled Pennsylvania House voted in November to impeach Larry Krasner, the liberal district attorney in Philadelphia. And a Republican-backed bill currently under consideration in the Indiana legislature would allow a special prosecuting attorney, appointed by the state attorney general, to step in if a local prosecutor is “categorically refusing to prosecute certain crimes.”

The debate in Georgia is unfolding amid mounting concerns over urban crime, particularly in Atlanta. But Ms. Willis has been a centrist law-and-order prosecutor who has targeted some prominent local rappers in a sprawling gang case. She is also part of the changing face of justice in Georgia: The state now has a record number of minority prosecutors — 14 of them — up from five in 2020, the year Ms. Willis, who is Black, was voted into office.

And of course, there is the Trump inquiry, the latest accelerant to the partisan conflagrations that have consumed the increasingly divided state for years. The subject of Ms. Willis’s investigation is whether Mr. Trump and his allies tried to flout Georgia’s democratic process with numerous instances of interference after his narrow 2020 election loss in the state.

Ms. Willis has said she is considering building a racketeering or conspiracy case. Anticipation is rising, particularly since the forewoman of a special grand jury charged with looking into the matter spoke publicly last month, saying that the jury’s final report, which is still largely under wraps, recommended indictments for more than a dozen people.

Ms. Willis must now decide whether to bring a case to a regular grand jury, which can issue indictments. A decision could come as early as May." NYT

continued >
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/05/u...eys-trump.html

Fecking rightwing cheaters

paywall stopping you - https://www.removepaywall.com/article/current

[bobabode]

"Jenna Ellis has been publicly censured through a stipulation to attorney discipline agreed to by the Office of Attorney Regulation Counsel and approved by the Presiding Disciplinary Judge. Through the stipulation, Ms. Ellis agreed that she violated Colo. RPC 8.4(c), which prohibits reckless, knowing, or intentional misrepresentations by attorneys. She violated this rule when, as counsel to the President Trump and the Trump campaign, she made a number of public statements about the November 2020 presidential election that were false. The Presiding Disciplinary Judge also has issued an opinion on this matter.

The public censure in this matter reinforces that even if engaged in political speech, there is a line attorneys cannot cross, particularly when they are speaking in a representative capacity."

https://www.coloradosupremecourt.us/...ementEllis.asp

Shit has a way of catching up to you, even if you rep for a twice impeached liar of a president.

Now yank her license, Colorado.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Now yank her license, Colorado.

Alas, Colorado has no such plans. The public statement says the Office of Attorney Regulation is done with her for now. Elsewhere on their site it says this:

In cases involving minor misconduct, an attorney may be admonished, censured, or placed in a diversion program. In serious matters, attorneys face suspension of their license to practice law or disbarment.

So, they have treated this as minor misconduct.