Let me help break it down for your. I'll type slowly to make it easy for you.
1) Biden is worthy of office because he got voted into office.
2) Biden criticized Trump for mishandling classified documents on national TV.
3) Biden was then found with classified documents in his possession. The hypocrisy is pretty rich.
4) The response to the discovery of the Biden documents by the national media, and folks here, is to try and diminish the import of the discovery of Biden's documents by focusing on scope or situational differences. While these differences are significant to you and yours, they may or may not make a whit of difference to the prosecution of either case.
5) Reflexive claims that Trump "obstructed" are interesting for conversational purposes, but no one has been found guilty of anything. There's more evidence that Clinton obstructed the investigation of documents in her possession by
destroying evidence. Yes, we learned from Comey that "no reasonable prosecutor" would bring charges in cases like this.
6) The Biden documents were moved more than once. Biden left office in 2017, and the Penn Biden Center didn't open until 2018. Where were those classified materials kept in the interim? And what else was stored there? The lack of curiosity about a number of details about the Biden case from the media and folks here is...interesting.
7) Regarding the Penn Biden Center, we know that Hunter Biden was involved in the opening of the center, and possibly the funding of it. Documents show that the Hunter requested keys for the Penn Biden center to be
provided to Chinese nationals. Why does Gongwen Dong, a CFO of the Kam Fei Group, which is an investment firm based in Hong Kong, need keys to the Penn Biden center? No curiosity about this at all, I guess.
There are many other odd questions about the circumstances surrounding these documents, but the media (and you) want to be dismissive of these questions and the obvious hypocrisy while trying to shift the focus to Trump.
No curiosity about these details, I guess.