Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo
Why do you insist on doubling down on nonsense.
We lived there for years and went through several hurricanes, David was the worst I think and each time it was party time. A hurricane party is a two day affair with beer, beer and more beer. Back then, beer was only 3.2%, so a case did not last very long.
Just look at the devastation from hurricanes in the past decade or so. Puerto Rico twice, now Florida, NY/NJ before that. Unimaginable damage and some places not even safe to live anymore. So screw your data, I can make a given set of data look good, bad, indifferent or downright scary.
|
It's not "my data". It's NOAA's data.
You're making the case that your recent experiences - the last decade or so - are unique. They're not.
Hurricane Katrina was far and away the costliest storm in terms of damage to make landfall in the US. It may not have been the most powerful, however. That happened in 1935, when a Cat 5 storm hit the
Florida Keys around Labor Day that year. Katrina isn't the most powerful Atlantic storm on record, either. That "honor" belongs to a hurricane that hit Cuba in 1924.
In fact, the data on such storms shows that the most powerful were not recent. The
5 most powerful on the list struck in 1955 or earlier.
Neither has the last 4 or 5 decades produced significantly greater named hurricanes that the historical average. The worst decades for frequency and severity of named storms rank 1 - 5 as follows:
1) 1941-1950
2) 1881-1890
3) 1891-1900
4) 1911-1920
5) 1871-1880
The most recent decade that made the top 10 was 2001-2010, which came in a #7, followed at # by 1851-1860.
While recent storms like Maria, Katrina and now Ian have been shattering to lives and economies, they are potentially amplified in their impact on you because they came to you live on CNN and other networks, and in your case, some personal experience. But in the context of history, they're not, unfortunately, unusual.