Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-12-2020, 09:42 AM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waggs098 View Post
So do you think illegal immigrants should be able to to help decide how many representatives a state has or how many tax dollars they get?
Yes!


I have two solutions to illegal immigrants. If enacted would self deport the problem


1) Any and all businesses who hire them is seized, impounded. All assets confiscated.

2) Any and all who rent to sell to, shelter have the same fate. Seizure of property and assets.



Nowhere to work or live will leave.


Right now their is a reason they are here. Plenty of those who one one hand support them by employing and renting. Then complain about the problem.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-12-2020, 09:43 AM
Waggs098 Waggs098 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
Are they persons?
Yes they are person's but to me don't fall under "the whole number of FREE persons". If they are here illegally then they technically are not a citizen and not free.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-12-2020, 09:58 AM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waggs098 View Post
Yes they are person's but to me don't fall under "the whole number of FREE persons". If they are here illegally then they technically are not a citizen and not free.
The slave states were a driving force in having ALL of the population counted!
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-12-2020, 10:16 AM
Waggs098 Waggs098 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerets View Post
The slave states were a driving force in having ALL of the population counted!
Obviously to gain more power to the weight of the people who can vote. The same reason sanctuary cities want illegal immigrants counted.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-12-2020, 10:18 AM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,933
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waggs098 View Post
Obviously to gain more power to the weight of the people who can vote. The same reason sanctuary cities want illegal immigrants counted.
You in favor of the Electoral Collage deciding the President over a majority vote??
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-13-2020, 03:34 PM
Waggs098 Waggs098 is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Posts: 606
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oerets View Post
You in favor of the Electoral Collage deciding the President over a majority vote??
I'm not 100% on that one. Haven't decided for myself if we should have the electoral college or not. It is based on the majority though.

The citizens vote on the reps and sens then, the ec puts their votes twords the majority vote in most cases. Nebraska and Maine are the only states that will split ec votes based on district and maybe all states should go that way. The ec does give more election power to lower populated states which as a whole may be the way to go so that say new York and California don't entirely decide the election.

How do you feel on it?

Last edited by Waggs098; 09-13-2020 at 06:21 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-13-2020, 07:36 PM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Main problem with the EC is it overweighs the voteS of low population states, since even the smallest get 3 EC votes. In Wyoming each electoral college vote represents under 200,000 people. Other extreme is California, that only get one vote for every 718,000 people. Scarfing up all the low-population rural states is how Trump won in 2016 with less that a majority of the vote.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary

Last edited by donquixote99; 09-13-2020 at 09:03 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-13-2020, 07:55 PM
Oerets's Avatar
Oerets Oerets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Derby City U.S.A.
Posts: 8,933
The EC is out dated IMO.

Was brought about to equalize the slave states and rural areas with the urban.

Much like giving each state two senators no matter the population.


Is there a good fix?
Doubt it!
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-14-2020, 09:49 AM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
Main problem with the EC is it overweighs the voteS of low population states, since even the smallest get 3 EC votes. In Wyoming each electoral college vote represents under 200,000 people. Other extreme is California, that only get one vote for every 718,000 people. Scarfing up all the low-population rural states is how Trump won in 2016 with less that a majority of the vote.
Please provide a link to this analysis since it contradicts what I read in The Guardian (70k votes in three states) and WaPo (100k votes in four states) back in 2016 is why Trump won.

BTW, if Clinton had won it would have been with less than a popular vote majority too.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."

Last edited by nailer; 09-14-2020 at 09:55 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-14-2020, 10:22 AM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer View Post

BTW, if Clinton had won it would have been with less than a popular vote majority too.
Seriously?

This kind of nonsense.

Good God.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:58 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.