Joe Biden For President

[Oerets]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

This line comes right from Russia. And now its everywhere....

With a little help from here in the USA be my guess.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by Oerets

Hate even talking about it on here now.

Evidently the new talking point from the cult is Biden has dementia or had a stroke.

A family member posted a Sky News report out of Australia heavily edited from yesterday using a stutter as proof. When I pointed this out he said Biden does not or never had a stutter................

Who has dementia or had a stroke, Biden or tRump?
That's not even a question

[Waggs098]

Originally Posted by Oerets

Hate even talking about it on here now.

Evidently the new talking point from the cult is Biden has dementia or had a stroke.

A family member posted a Sky News report out of Australia heavily edited from yesterday using a stutter as proof. When I pointed this out he said Biden does not or never had a stutter................

Actually didn't the left say the same things about McCain and they were worried about Sarah? I think they just brought up the age and he might not last.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by Waggs098

Actually didn't the left say the same things about McCain and they were worried about Sarah? I think they just brought up the age and he might not last.

The Repubs were the ones that claimed McCain had dementia. Anyone with a brain would worry about Palin behind the Resolute Desk.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by RickeyM

The Repubs were the ones that claimed McCain had dementia. Anyone with a half a brain would worry about Palin behind the Resolute Desk.

Fixed that for you, Rick. (grin)

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Waggs098

Actually didn't the left say the same things about McCain and they were worried about Sarah? I think they just brought up the age and he might not last.

Weaker than piss whataboutism, Waggles. Comparing the Bimbo Quitter of the Great White North to California's former attorney general and current U.S. Senator is a weak move, sonny. Do better, kid.

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Fixed that for you, Rick. (grin)

Thanks

[Waggs098]

Now he says it's a constitutional issue.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost....k-mandate/amp/

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Waggs098

Now he says it's a constitutional issue.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/nypost....k-mandate/amp/

Compared to the firehose of lies from your big daddy, Don the Deadbeat?

Please...

[bobabode]

"For weeks, the mantra of the data nerd has been that President Trump can still win reelection. The Democratic nightmare scenario — Trump loses the popular vote but again wins the electoral college — is very much still on the table.

But the same statistical models that show a path for Trump also outline an oft-overlooked possibility: an outright landslide for Democratic challenger Joe Biden.

The chance of a massive sweep by the former vice president is a reminder that for all the Democrats present this election as a choice between more Trump and a return to normalcy, there’s another possibility on offer. If Biden turns out voters in numbers that give him a huge victory, they may well elect a Congress and state officials eager and able to enact a sweeping progressive agenda.

The numbers are clear. The average outcome produced by an election simulator I recently built (you can learn more about it here) gives Biden 319 electoral votes. Trump still has a chance in this model — he wins about 1 in 5 of the scenarios generated. But in roughly 10 percent of the model’s simulations, Biden earned 400 or more electoral votes. In these cases, Biden easily sweeps swing states such as Pennsylvania, Florida, Michigan, Arizona, North Carolina and Wisconsin and reaches deep into red territory to get electoral votes from states such as Georgia, Texas, Iowa and Ohio. In the sunniest simulations, Biden wins enough rural White voters to grab deeply Republican states such as Alaska or South Carolina. Trump mostly keeps his base — Appalachia, the Interior West and the rural South — but those states alone don’t come close to cracking 200 electoral votes.

That might seem outlandish, considering that Obama won only 365 electoral votes in his massive 2008 victory. But Biden has a bigger lead now than Obama did at this point in 2008, and he’s competitive in big red states such as Texas and Georgia. That’s why my model — as well as those from FiveThirtyEight and the Economist — see 400 or more electoral votes as an optimistic but plausible scenario for Biden.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opini...ge%2Fstory-ans

Biden over 400? Sounds good to me, this country needs to repudiate unequivocally everything about Trump and his vile bigotry.