The modern brownshirts in all their glory

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by Not Insane

"Lying racist criminal"? Absurd.

For starters, all politicians lie. It's a fool's errand to judge a politician by his words, when deeds are what counts. Criminal? He's not in jail nor prison and hs never been. You may think he's one. Brian Stelter may think he's one. But he's not.

Racist? I've already addressed that one. And I've heard people call him racist, but they never give actual examples, while I've given examples galore of him NOT being racist. So have a lot of black "personalities", both at the convention and in their op-ed's etc.

i.e. it is baloney until you back it up with proof.

Give me a break. You know I'm right, But I could back it up with a book and you'd still call it baloney. Don't know if you're being paid or not, but you're doing it like a job....

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Give me a break. You know I'm right, But I could back it up with a book and you'd still call it baloney. Don't know if you're being paid or not, but you're doing it like a job....

Explanation for morons like this Insane clown can be found in books about Jim Jones, the Manson family, the "good Germans", etc. Cult behavior, plain and simple, by one who's clearly a sociopath. No easy way out for these sorry suckers. Best thing is to ignore their nonsense.

[donquixote99]

Oh, I don't see Not Insane as a moronic cult member. He is too smart for that, and he well knows it. He sees himself as more like a Manson. A manipulator of the moronic public.

[Chicks]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Oh, I don't see Not Insane as a moronic cult member. He is too smart for that, and he well knows it. He sees himself as more like a Manson. A manipulator of the moronic public.

He's laughably uninformed compared to the journalists and other sources I read daily, including HCR, and true conservative pundits like Jennifer Rubin and George F Will.

His "sources" are all Reich-wing propaganda, never real, facts-based journalism.

He constantly calls out others for doing exactly what he does without end - projecting, ad homs, etc. He's simply gaslighting, perhaps for some sad religious cult.

Yes, he's an ignorant clown. Charlie Manson would have had him for breakfast. He would have happily drunk Jimbo's Kool Aid.

[RickeyM]

I agree with Donq I don't see Insane as moronic. He, for whatever reason is all in for tRump. He's smart enough to know just what tRump is but he doesn't care Unwilling to acknowledge anything bad about tRump and frequently projecting his shortcomings, faults, errors and flaws on Biden. Not dumb but definitely on a vacation from reality.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by Chicks

He's laughably uninformed compared to the journalists and other sources I read daily, including HCR, and true conservative pundits like Jennifer Rubin and George F Will.

His "sources" are all Reich-wing propaganda, never real, facts-based journalism.

He constantly calls out others for doing exactly what he does without end - projecting, ad homs, etc. He's simply gaslighting, perhaps for some sad religious cult.

Yes, he's an ignorant clown. Charlie Manson would have had him for breakfast. He would have happily drunk Jimbo's Kool Aid.

He has to ignore a lot of facts, and doesn't have good arguments available so he has to use poor ones. But he does a clever job within his constraints

[RickeyM]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

He has to ignore a lot of facts, and doesn't have good arguments available so he has to use poor ones. But he does a clever job within his constraints

That sounds an awful lot like the Mango Jeezus himself

[Oerets]

Originally Posted by RickeyM

That sounds an awful lot like the Mango Jeezus himself

Or someone being paid to write the current disinformation of the day.

[Not Insane]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

Give me a break. You know I'm right, But I could back it up with a book and you'd still call it baloney. Don't know if you're being paid or not, but you're doing it like a job....

I've been doing this since 1997. It's a hobby that I greatly enjoy. I started just a few months after I dumped TV. I love it because unlike TV, when I see bs I can do more than just fantasize about throwing a shoe at the TV and it hits the MSM talking head in, well, the head.

And no, I do not believe he is a "racist". I have to put it in quotes because I believe all men are, to one degree or another, racist, sexist, ageist, etc. His track record speaks for itself, but nobody here wants to talk about it. I offered a bit of truth and nobody denied it. "You know I'm right" is not an argument.

In fact, I'll take it a step further. I learned in my early days of arguing this stuff on the interwebs that if I simply know I'm right, but can't actually come up with evidence to support my perspective, it's possible I've been duped and trusted authority that did not deserve my trust. If my only argument is "everybody knows", it may be that I'm a part of a field of lemmings that put our trust in the wrong information source.

Make no mistake. The only man to ever live that I truly trust was hung on a cross. The rest of them are constantly being re-evaluated by me in everything they do. Trump is no saint, but then, neither was King David. Nor was Soloman, nor Reagan, Lincoln, nor Washington, though I am told that the latter never told a lie.

So I'm forced to make decisions regarding who shall represent me in the government when offered nothing but a solid fields of flawed individuals. I'll take the womanizing solid decision maker over the saintly beta male that trades away my country's strength. As the woman said to the NPR reporter, I'm voting for president, not husband.

Bottom line is this: You can find flaws in every man alive. But when it comes to electing a president, you need to look at the candidate's core values as a leader of any organization and his track record. Trump may not have been a friend to subcontrators, but he was a friend to his company. And he has proven, since January of 2017, that he may not be a friend to China, Mexico, Russia, or any of the other sovereign nations out there, but he's a friend to the US, always looking out for our best interests (at least more than a lot of previous presidents). So, for the second time in my lifetime, I'm voting FOR a candidate in 2020. And I base that on what he's done. And make no mistake. One of the biggest things he's done is shine a light on all the cockroaches within our government. And that, my friend, has not fully played out yet. The foot is coming down on them - after election night - no matter who wins. At least, his track record tells me that is what will happen.

We'll see.

But the body of evidence tells us he is far from racist and has done more for blacks in this country - in their daily lives - than any president in modern history. Both before and after he was elected. The evidence is easily found, once you get past the opinion portion of the opinion pieces.

[Not Insane]

Originally Posted by Oerets

Or someone being paid to write the current disinformation of the day.

So, you can't bring solid arguments, so the next phase is to question my motives. Cool story, bro'.

FWIW, I did use a relatively weak argument on purpose. I only had to do better than your "non-argument". I've not seen a shred of evidence offered here that Trump is racist. Only the unsupported claim is here, unless I somehow missed a post somewhere.