Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer
The way you "put it" is a deflection away from Balzac's point.
|
I was disagreeing with his point. Saying "Behind every great fortune is a great crime" is like saying "behind every poor person is a person of poor character."
That is, it may be more true than not, but it is not always true. Each case is individual.
In fact, this may strike at the core difference between the leftist and the classical liberal viewpoint. the former sees people as members of a group while the latter sees them as indiiduals that may be "colored to some degree" by which group they align with, be it racial, sexual, or as a member of the astronomy club. This may be why so many believed I didn't vote for Obama because I'm "a racist" even though I've never voted for a democrat in my life. They see us as groups, but I saw him as a very poor candidate running on a platform with which I have almost no agreement. I voted against the man , not his color, but his pary affiliation did have an impact. And yet some of the very people that accused me of being racist were voting for him BECAUSE HE WAS BLACK.
The irony, it burns.
But yeah, I got his quote. I just disagree with it and gave examples. I got his "point". And for what it's worth, Proverbs warns against getting "quick" wealth, and I consider great wealth coming from a great crime to be along those lines. It harms the receiver and is quickly lost.
I know that those that receive ill gotten gains will reap the reward. I don't need to subscribe to the politics of envy. I only concern myself with the ill gotten gain of others under two circumstances:
1. They are attempting to directly take it from me (e.g. huge gasoline carbon tax or home invasion or identity theft)
1. it is my job to deal with it (e.g. I'm a cop, DA or Judge).
Other than that, I don't care how much Soros has as long as it is not directly impacting MY life. He's free to make all the money, legally, his heart desires.
While I do the same...