Its Official: Clinton Campaign Tied to Russian "Dossier"

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

It seems you somehow believe that Trump's and Hillary's sleaziness are mutually exclusive (i.e., if one is proven sleazy, it conveys righteousness/innocence on the other). I, on the other hand, believe that both are sleazy and unethical (for the record, I didn't vote for either of them for this very reason).

No. I believe that any evidence against Trump personally is manufactured or, at the most, highly speculative and circumstantial. The evidence against Clinton, not so much.

For example, remember the media (and you) hyperventilating about this meeting:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/polit...=.4763ccbd2bf4

By God, you folks fully believed that that this was silver bullet proof that Trump was "colluding" with the Russians.

Yet, here we have a "dossier" that was bought and paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and was sourced by an individual with access to contacts within the Russian government. The Clinton team's legal counsel lied about paying for it for a year. The document was "opposition research", but that didn't stop the Swamp - Dems and Repubs alike - from shopping it around to to law enforcement and at least one (and probably more) of those agencies used that document as a basis for their investigations into "collusion" (including a Special Counsel ordered raid on the home of the private citizen). Yet, the media - nor any here - doesn't seem to find any issues with that.

Not surprising.