Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-06-2017, 06:41 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Reckless Accusation a High Crime or Misdemeanor?

FBI Director Comey is doing an odd thing: asking the Justice Department to deny that there were wiretaps as alleged by Trump, instead of denying it himself. Probably relates to Trump being a sitting president, while Hillary Clinton, one week before the election, wasn't.

Trump calls for a congressional investigation. I agree. I'd like the House to investigate whether this reckless libel against the previous President, this blatant huge lie, itself rises to the level of a 'high crime or misdemeanor.'
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-06-2017, 07:30 AM
nailer's Avatar
nailer nailer is offline
Rational Anarchist
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
FBI Director Comey is doing an odd thing: asking the Justice Department to deny that there were wiretaps as alleged by Trump, instead of denying it himself. Probably relates to Trump being a sitting president, while Hillary Clinton, one week before the election, wasn't.

Trump calls for a congressional investigation. I agree. I'd like the House to investigate whether this reckless libel against the previous President, this blatant huge lie, itself rises to the level of a 'high crime or misdemeanor.'
To which alleged libel of Obama are you referring?

Libel is a civil court issue, not congressional.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."

Last edited by nailer; 03-06-2017 at 07:37 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-06-2017, 07:30 AM
whell whell is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Metro Detroit
Posts: 13,135
Or, he might have knowledge that someone at Justice was involved in such a request, and wants to shift the focus there.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-06-2017, 07:39 AM
JCricket's Avatar
JCricket JCricket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: colorado
Posts: 1,595
Paranoia? Libel or slander? Free speech?

Treason? Any crime at all?

Unbelievably poor judgement and or BS from Trump. More of the same old Trump. Should there be any consequences? For a normal person? How about because he is president?


Rambling thoughts before my first cup of coffee. Good morning all.
__________________
Instead of a debate, how about a discussion? I want to learn, I don't care about winning.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-06-2017, 07:45 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer View Post
To which alleged libel of Obama are you referring?

Libel is a civil court issue, not congressional.
I think a 'high crime or misdemeanor' is whatever the Congress says it is. This would be a misdemeanor. Ordinarily, of course, a libel is a tort, not a crime, but we can call this 'malicious mischief.'

What makes it 'high' is who did it, and who they accused.

Bottom line is we can't have a president who goes around acting like this.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-06-2017, 07:51 AM
JCricket's Avatar
JCricket JCricket is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: colorado
Posts: 1,595
we can hope he steps into a bear trap like nixon did.
__________________
Instead of a debate, how about a discussion? I want to learn, I don't care about winning.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-06-2017, 07:52 AM
sheltiedave sheltiedave is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,164
The question has arisen whether Trump and his confederates have had significant and consequential contact with Russian interests before, during, and after the election that either

-involved any type of conspiracy to influence the outcome of the election
-involved any type of negotiation regarding sanctions prior to Trump being sworn in
-involved any type of financial or governmental illegality with Russia.

Seeing that Trump can ask Congress and the Senate to fire up an investigative committee and any hour of any day of any week re. Wiretaps, with every apparatus being under Republican aegis, I find his baying at the moon on Twitter to be both repugnant and oddly counterproductive. He probably will get his investigations, and create a very large and divisive Republican faction opposed to Trump's Russian pogrom.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-06-2017, 08:00 AM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
There's been plenty of "reckless accusation".

All of it against Trump.

I would categorize a good 80% of the posts on this forum to fall under that category.
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-06-2017, 08:23 AM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 15,279
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad View Post
There's been plenty of "reckless accusation".

All of it against Trump.

I would categorize a good 80% of the posts on this forum to fall under that category.
Is it reckless to ask for an independent investigation of activities between the Trump camp and the Russians?
__________________
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-06-2017, 08:28 AM
MrPots MrPots is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 3,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
FBI Director Comey is doing an odd thing: asking the Justice Department to deny that there were wiretaps as alleged by Trump, instead of denying it himself. Probably relates to Trump being a sitting president, while Hillary Clinton, one week before the election, wasn't.

Trump calls for a congressional investigation. I agree. I'd like the House to investigate whether this reckless libel against the previous President, this blatant huge lie, itself rises to the level of a 'high crime or misdemeanor.'
So they will investigate it 30 times and come up with nothing. Meanwhile the nations business will stagnate. This is how out government works.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.