Hillary Clinton Now Leads by 1 Million in History-Making Popular Vote Total

[ZeroJunk]

Originally Posted by nailer

No, really. It's precisely what you said regardless of your elections deflection.

Nonsense. It is the entire reason that everybody and his brother was absolutely sure that Hillary would win the election. She had so many electoral votes that she considered so built in that she didn't even campaign there.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by ZeroJunk

Nonsense. It is the entire reason that everybody and his brother was absolutely sure that Hillary would win the election. She had so many electoral votes that she considered so built in that she didn't even campaign there.

Still deflecting I see.

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by ZeroJunk

Nonsense. It is the entire reason that everybody and his brother was absolutely sure that Hillary would win the election. She had so many electoral votes that she considered so built in that she didn't even campaign there.

Expressed another way: She had faith in large urban centers.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by whell

The House is apportioned by population already.

I'm fine with that. The problem with the house seats is Gerrymandering. That's another issue.

Originally Posted by whell

The Senate purposefully was not.

Doing it on purpose doesn't make it right.

Originally Posted by whell

No changes required or desired.

Well that depends on who you ask.

I have a huge problem with Wyoming getting a Senator for every 192,000 population while California only gets one for every 19.4 million. That's a difference of about 100-1.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

Just a counter to Sanctuary Cities.

And what is so awful about sanctuary cities, that corresponds to gutting federal protection for voting rights?

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

And what is so awful about sanctuary cities, that corresponds to gutting federal protection for voting rights?

"Sanctuary cities" is a veiled attempt to promote bastions for Dems illegally.

The Repubs are going to counter any which way they can.

[Pio1980]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

"Sanctuary cities" is an veiled attempt to promote bastions for Dems illegally.

The Repubs are going to counter any which way they can.

Can beneficiaries of sanctuary cities vote?

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

[Dondilion]

Originally Posted by Pio1980

Can beneficiaries of sanctuary cities vote?

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Eventually.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

Eventually.

And you give me grief.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by Dondilion

"Sanctuary cities" is a veiled attempt to promote bastions for Dems illegally.

The Repubs are going to counter any which way they can.

Will they counter with siege lines and airstrikes?

(Once starting the military metaphors, such as 'bastions,' it's kind of hard to stop....)