Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Economy
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 07-13-2010, 11:42 AM
JJIII's Avatar
JJIII JJIII is offline
AKA Sister Mary JJ
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Upper East Tennessee
Posts: 5,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post

In the old days doctors used leeches, now we have drug companies.
Give the man a Kewpie Doll!
__________________
"Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please." (Mark Twain)
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 07-13-2010, 12:22 PM
BlueStreak's Avatar
BlueStreak BlueStreak is offline
Area Man
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Swamp
Posts: 27,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by merrylander View Post
In the old days doctors used leeches, now we have drug companies.
So, the Leeches used to BE the treatment, now the leeches MAKE the treatment? Interesting.

Dave
__________________
"When the lie is so big and the fog so thick, the Republican trick can play out again....."-------Frank Zappa
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 07-13-2010, 02:30 PM
Charles Charles is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 10,348
You guys need to lay off of big pharma.

My neighbor the drug dealer is wanting a new Corvette.

Chas
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 07-13-2010, 07:08 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Combwork View Post
? I'm not sure about your reference; are you saying the drug companies are not spending their profits on research? I didn't say all profits, but enough to get the next wonder drug to market and sell under the brand name for as long as they can.
It seems to me they're spending a lot keeping the results of unfavorable research out of the news and away from regulators.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/07/13/he...e&ref=homepage

Much the same happened with Vioxx, IIRC.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 07-14-2010, 07:08 AM
Combwork's Avatar
Combwork Combwork is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Scotland
Posts: 658
What goes around

Quote Finbow "It seems to me they're spending a lot keeping the results of unfavorable research out of the news and away from regulators."

With us the worst was Thalidomide. Having passed all the tests it was prescribed as a sedative and to treat morning sickness during pregnancy. In those days, sedatives, sleeping pills, uppers and downers were seen as wonder drugs and with hindsight, over-prescribed. When babies started appearing with limbs either deformed or missing, it took years and years before the manufacturers (and by default the government) admitted any kind of liability and gave proper financial support for the families involved.

Marrylander and Boreus. I think the main difference between UK and USA health care is the backbone of the UK is the National Health Service with private care available for those who can afford it, while the backbone of the USA is private health care with public health care available to those who can't afford it. Maybe a bit simplistic, but that's what it looks like from the outside.

As to research, the NHS does research but a lot is duplication of what has already been done. For some reason that I've never understood, in general the UK does not accept test results from other countries (including the USA) so has to do its own. A lot of wasted time, wasted money to prove what's already been proved. As a guess, the more litiginous nature of things in the USA would make for more stringent testing of any drug before allowing it on the market.

Last edited by Combwork; 07-14-2010 at 07:12 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 07-14-2010, 07:56 AM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
The Glaxo Smith Klein deal does not surprise me in the least. Listen closely to the TV commercials sometime, with all these "new" drugs the side effects are worse than the disease they profess to alieviate. Big Pharma is only interested in research for diseases that will provide the widest possible market. If what ails you is only something affecting, say 5% of the population, you are SOL.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt

Last edited by merrylander; 07-14-2010 at 08:41 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 07-14-2010, 08:24 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by Combwork View Post
In general the UK does not accept test results from other countries (including the USA) so has to do its own. A lot of wasted time, wasted money to prove what's already been proved. As a guess, the more litiginous nature of things in the USA would make for more stringent testing of any drug before allowing it on the market.
Maybe your Thalidomide reference answers your own question. FWIW, the Food and Drug Administration in the US doesn't accept test results from other nations either. Hell, the same applies to consensus codes and standards in general. We don't accept the DIN, the Germans don't accept ASTM, NFPA, etc. I guess all it's human nature not to trust "foreigners" and their silly concepts of what makes things tick.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 07-14-2010, 01:31 PM
noonereal noonereal is offline
Abby Normal
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,245
I trust no pharmaceutical company. They are a leading cause of death in this country.

Last edited by noonereal; 07-19-2010 at 07:40 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 07-14-2010, 01:38 PM
merrylander's Avatar
merrylander merrylander is offline
Resident octogenarian
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Maryland
Posts: 20,860
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
Maybe your Thalidomide reference answers your own question. FWIW, the Food and Drug Administration in the US doesn't accept test results from other nations either. Hell, the same applies to consensus codes and standards in general. We don't accept the DIN, the Germans don't accept ASTM, NFPA, etc. I guess all it's human nature not to trust "foreigners" and their silly concepts of what makes things tick.

But they are perfectly willing to let some of the compunds the drugs are made from in frm China.
__________________
Great minds discuss ideas; Average minds discuss events; Small minds discuss people.
Eleanor Roosevelt
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-14-2010, 01:41 PM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Combwork View Post
With us the worst was Thalidomide. Having passed all the tests it was prescribed as a sedative and to treat morning sickness during pregnancy.
We had the exact same experience with Thalidomide here.

John
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:49 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.