|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

09-29-2016, 11:39 AM
|
 |
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo
I meant the discussion and not the decision, and that's not till another five weeks or so (unless one has voted by mail).
|
Hillary is the most qualified candidate. Do you agree or disagree with this Rajoo? If you disagree give evidence that supports another candidate is more qualified. If you think she's the most qualified, what's there to discuss other than monotony?
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Last edited by nailer; 09-29-2016 at 11:41 AM.
|

09-29-2016, 11:41 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 15,281
|
|
Q.E.D., vote for Hillary, Trump is a monster.
No wonder the youth of America are so disengaged. They can smell a BS line better than mature adults.
__________________
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. Thomas Jefferson
|

09-29-2016, 11:46 AM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,931
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo
I may ingonre you in principle but not the content of your posts. 
WaPo and NYT are not very credible to me anymore, in fact most media is not since one never knows who owns whom. Besides I meant the conversation here instead of a steady trickle of HuffPo and their lack of praise for Trump, as if they would have any objective comments on this subject. For all I know, Priorities USA has an interest in the Huffers.
|
I can't quite sort this. If I composed a little essay on Hillary, would you trust me more or less than the NY Times?
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
|

09-29-2016, 11:46 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 15,281
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer
Hillary is the most qualified candidate. Do you agree or disagree with this Rajoo? If you disagree give evidence that supports another candidate is more qualified. If you think she's the most qualified, what's there to discuss other than monotony?
|
By what measure I humbly ask, and yes I disagree simply due to lack of fundamental support for her from the electorate.
No excitement, no trust, very little interest in these elections, etc.
__________________
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. Thomas Jefferson
|

09-29-2016, 11:50 AM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,931
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo
NYT, WaPo & HuffPo? So where is the balance?
|
Balance is for media that wants everyone for customers. So they push the idea that there are two sides to everything. But sometimes there is no legitimate 'balance.'
EARTH: Round or Flat?
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
|

09-29-2016, 11:58 AM
|
 |
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rajoo
By what measure I humbly ask, and yes I disagree simply due to lack of fundamental support for her from the electorate.
No excitement, no trust, very little interest in these elections, etc.
|
It's you're job to determine what to measure when deciding which candidate is most qualified.
And there's nothing humble in your asking.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
|

09-29-2016, 12:00 PM
|
 |
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
Balance is for media that wants everyone for customers. So they push the idea that there are two sides to everything. But sometimes there is no legitimate 'balance.'
EARTH: Round or Flat?
|
Neither, it's a sphere.
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
|

09-29-2016, 12:05 PM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 15,281
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer
Neither, it's a sphere.
|
Humility personified with that comeback. 
And the term I would use is better qualified and not most, since by definition 'most' is not attainable.
__________________
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. Thomas Jefferson
|

09-29-2016, 12:07 PM
|
 |
Rational Anarchist
|
|
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: DFW
Posts: 7,323
|
|
Low hanging fruit.
And most is most definitely attainable is this context.
most
determiner & pronoun
determiner: most; pronoun: most
1. superlative of many, much.
2. greatest in amount or degree.
"they've had the most success"
https://www.google.com/#q=most+define
__________________
"We have met the enemy and he is us."
Last edited by nailer; 09-29-2016 at 12:16 PM.
|

09-29-2016, 12:12 PM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,931
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by nailer
Low hanging fruit. 
|
Compulsive disregard of the actual point.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.
|