$153 million in Bill and Hillary Clinton speaking fees, documented

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by finnbow

At least the people willingly paid to hear the Clintons speak.

Of course they paid willingly.

They are getting political favors from the Clintons worth far more than what they are paying them. It's a bargain for them.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by bobabode

When are we going to get a look at Trump's tax returns? What's he hiding?

I'm sorry that this subject is so embarrassing for you that you have to try to deflect it and make it about Trump.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by Pio1980

Anyone here really think Donny dinkydick isn't tied into Wall Street and the Right wing beholden to it?

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Do you have any proof of that?

Because there is plenty of proof that Hillary has been bought and paid for.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Do you have any proof of that?

Because there is plenty of proof that Hillary has been bought and paid for.

Not really. There's proof she and Bill took money for speeches. Even your girl $arah Palin takes $100K and Rudy Guiliani makes $270K per speech.

http://www.salon.com/2013/07/17/the_...avies_partner/

For that matter, Hillary gets $200k per speech, but The Donald gets $1.5 million per speech. Does that mean he's 7.5X more bought and sold than Hillary?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/washi...?id=24551590#1

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Not really. There's proof she and Bill took money for speeches. Even your girl $arah Palin takes $100K and Rudy Guiliani makes $270K per speech.

Dude, I despise Republicans as much as I do the Clintonistas.

But I understand your need to misrepresent me like that as you candidate is indefensible on her own.

Originally Posted by finnbow

but The Donald gets $1.5 million per speech

Really?

I am unaware of that.

Can you document it?

[barbara]

And Donald is not beholden to Wall Street...?

http://www.npr.org/2016/08/05/488825...nomic-advisors

[nailer]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Not really. There's proof she and Bill took money for speeches. Even your girl $arah Palin takes $100K and Rudy Guiliani makes $270K per speech.

http://www.salon.com/2013/07/17/the_...avies_partner/

For that matter, Hillary gets $200k per speech, but The Donald gets $1.5 million per speech. Does that mean he's 7.5X more bought and sold than Hillary?

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/washi...?id=24551590#1

Of course not. “The Donald earned a staggering $1.5 million per speech at The Learning Annex’s ‘real estate wealth expos’ in 2006 and 2007,” according to Forbes. “Trump appeared at 17 seminars and collected this fee for each one.”

[nailer]

Originally Posted by barbara

And Donald is not beholden to Wall Street...?

http://www.npr.org/2016/08/05/488825...nomic-advisors

Those advisors might just be beholden to The Donald if he wins.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

I'm sorry that this subject is so embarrassing for you that you have to try to deflect it and make it about Trump.

I've heard that your precious Donny makes $1 million per speech. If he'd release his tax returns like the Clintons have done we would know for sure. How is that deflecting?

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by finnbow

I sensed that to be a throwaway line from Assange, somehow trying to show that he's an equal opportunity hacker.

That occurred to me too. We'll see.