FBI's Comey says no case against Clinton

[CarlV]

Originally Posted by JBS...

Above. The. Law.

LOL, like Bush & Cheney?

Take the 911/Iraq lies15 years later and half a million body bags filled and we are still there.

And Bush did cause the formation of ISIS too. Hmmm, maybe that is why the goppers want terrorists to be able to buy AR15's unchecked.


Carl

[CarlV]

Then we gots Raygun with his Iran Contra caper. And actually giving Bin Laden money to fight Russians in Afghanistan too.


Carl

[barbara]

And of course, now the GOP is going to investigate the

[barbara]

And of course, now the GOP is going to investigate the FBI


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...mails-40367442


Is there any end to this?
The time, the money.... All for nothing.

[MrPots]

The GOP has to spend all of it's efforts on witch hunts else they'd be accused of doing nothing at all. They certainly don't govern......


And thank god for that too because everywhere they've tried for the past 30 years has been a total and complete disaster.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by barbara

And of course, now the GOP is going to investigate the FBI


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...mails-40367442


Is there any end to this?
The time, the money.... All for nothing.

As usual, Rep. Cummings gets right to the point.

"Republican after Republican praised Director Comey's impeccable record of independence—right up until the moment he issued his conclusion," said the committee's top Democrat, Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland. "The only emergency here is that yet another Republican conspiracy theory is slipping away." ABC

[whell]

Originally Posted by barbara

And of course, now the GOP is going to investigate the FBI


http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireS...mails-40367442


Is there any end to this?
The time, the money.... All for nothing.

Sorry, but a reasonable person can look at the facts in this case and wonder whether justice was honestly served. Comey laid out the case against Clinton pretty well. He then stated that "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."

When you look at the law, Section (d) here, its pretty hard to reconcile Comey's statement that "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case". The law states that negligence is a threshold, not intent. Comey lays out negligence chapter and verse in his statement.

Comey took no questions at the end of his statement yesterday. I don't think its unreasonable to ask him questions about how he came to his conclusion that "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case" when the law seems to be pretty clear.

[Rajoo]

The Daily 202: Clinton’s credibility gap widens after FBI rebuke

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...b92a22d5b2044/

Caution: Information presented above may not be suitable for dyed in the wool Hillary worshipers.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

Sorry, but a reasonable person can look at the facts in this case and wonder whether justice was honestly served. Comey laid out the case against Clinton pretty well. He then stated that "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case."

When you look at the law, Section (d) here, its pretty hard to reconcile Comey's statement that "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case". The law states that negligence is a threshold, not intent. Comey lays out negligence chapter and verse in his statement.

Comey took no questions at the end of his statement yesterday. I don't think its unreasonable to ask him questions about how he came to his conclusion that "no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case" when the law seems to be pretty clear.

It's over, Mike. Another Clinton witch hunt goes up in smoke.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by Rajoo

The Daily 202: Clinton’s credibility gap widens after FBI rebuke

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...b92a22d5b2044/

Caution: Information presented above may not be suitable for dyed in the wool Hillary worshipers.

Weren't you worshippers at shrine of the 'Prophet of Lake Champlain' freaking out over 16 negative stories in the Post just recently?