Hillary For President

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by noonereal

you guys really thing a neutral party would not see you as left wing nuts?

Every word out you is pro DEm, pro Hill, every word is anti Trump, anti, GOP.

It's a want blinding your reason.

If you believe that, then you haven't been paying attention or else reading without that level of objectivity you're so famous for.

Speaking only for myself, though, I am a "left wing nut"
and proud of it.

http://politicalchat.org/showpost.ph...6&postcount=12

http://politicalchat.org/showpost.ph...6&postcount=12

[Pio1980]

I see the Trump campaign as an ego driven self-promotional reality show with all the solid substance and purpose of that format. If this dog actually runs down this car, he will be presented with a result he is woefully ill-equipped to approach.
And we will be stuck with a clueless pompous narcissistic bullshit artist as the POTUS.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

[JJIII]

Sort of like the present?

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by MrPots

Soo...you think that the "hell hath no fury like the wrath of a woman scorned', most feared by all men, will be top priority of the first female POTUS? As Hillary, superwoman takes out her wrath over Bill's infidelity on all the men of America......take that you vermin scum!

Sounds plausible to me. I've been married for 36 years...I know how women work , they don't forget anything.....

the actual quote is;

“Heaven has no rage, like love to hatred turned,
Nor hell a fury, like a woman scorned.”

William Congreve - The Mourning Bride, read it when I was 15 or 16


And white men do just fine in this country it is the women who are relegated to second class citizenry, I saw the crap my late wife had to put up with until I intervened. lad you know how women work Potsy. I knew how my late wife's mind worked but that was only because we were in love, Damned if I know how any other women work.

[Pio1980]

Originally Posted by JJIII

Sort of like the present?

Oh, please!
Barak was at least as qualified, if not more so imo.
His shortcomings were similar with delegation of authority and choosing advisors, valuing loyalty over competence.
However, I find him much more trustworthy than the GWD, and without the self-referential pompous narcissism and flagrant hyperbole that marks the GWD's style.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

[merrylander]

Originally Posted by Pio1980

I see the Trump campaign as an ego driven self-promotional reality show with all the solid substance and purpose of that format. If this dog actually runs down this car, he will be presented with a result he is woefully ill-equipped to approach.
And we will be stuck with a clueless pompous narcissistic bullshit artist as the POTUS.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk

Glad I kept my Canadian citizenship.

[bobabode]

Moody Analytics forecasting Clinton over T'Rump. 332 to 206

http://thehill.com/policy/finance/ec...form=hootsuite

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by JJIII

Sort of like the present?

Jesus Mary and Joseph i know it's a crazy election year, but can we try not to take every cheap shot that comes along, for cripes sake?

[nailer]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

I don't see one word indicating no use for 'white men.'

Another attempt at 'humor?'

Read two lines up. The line you quoted is the author.

[nailer]

Originally Posted by noonereal

Not much humor but a little.... not intellectual banter... pot steering


but I feel the question valid in her repeated ignoring of the white male in favor of women women women, as evidenced in even my short blurbs of hers..

I mean I was just reading her twitter and it hit me....

so the question remains.

maybe it's even rhetorical, I don't know

It's just something that rab through my mind.

Hillary has the feminist male vote and the blinkered Democrat male vote. Is she interested in your vote?