Obama in Cuba

[whell]

Originally Posted by d-ray657

So when you said it was inaccurate, you were just slinging crap.

No, I can have an opinion, too. And I can regard your opinion as inaccurate unless you can offer up some proof.

See how that works?

[whell]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Gallup has President Obama's approval rate at +53%. Ponder that for moment Whell.
http://www.gallup.com/poll/113980/Ga...-Approval.aspx

So what?

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

So what?

So, fiddlesticks or buttons or sumpthin'...

[whell]

Originally Posted by bobabode

So fiddlesticks or buttons or sumpthin'...

...or buttons on balloons...

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by whell

...or buttons on balloons...

Don't you get snippy with me, mister...

[BlueStreak]

Originally Posted by merrylander

I beg to differ narcissists leave a lot of emotional trauma in their wake.

Notice too that all of The Donald's wives have been trophy wives. Again typical of that type there is no love just arm candy to show off.

Yep! Let the current Mrs. Trump get a few more years on her and The Donald will, most likely, move on. So long as he's rich another young thing will step right up.

And, just in case there are any Trump supporters watching on; No, I'm not "just jealous". Trump is incredibly shallow and more concerned about his own image than he is about anything else, including his wives. It's all about him, his image and his ego. That's what EVERYTHING is about with this guy, even his most personal relationships. EVERYTHING........

[whell]

Originally Posted by finnbow

If you're too blind to recognize Trump for what he is, that's your problem, not mine.

Read through this discussion for a confirmation of Trump's narcissism.

https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog...ality-disorder

A "confirmation" of narcissism? Again with the hyperbole, this time attempting to masquerade as "science"? You must be really desperate.

I'd be willing to wager that the folks rendering their opinions in this article are life-long Dems. Regardless, I thought making a diagnosis without a personal examination, taking medical history, etc, was a breach of ethics in medicine. Such ethical breaches don't seem to bother these folks too much, I guess.

[donquixote99]

Originally Posted by whell

A "confirmation" of narcissism? Again with the hyperbole, this time attempting to masquerade as "science"? You must be really desperate.

I'd be willing to wager that the folks rendering their opinions in this article are life-long Dems. Regardless, I thought making a diagnosis without a personal examination, taking medical history, etc, was a breach of ethics in medicine. Such ethical breaches don't seem to bother these folks too much, I guess.

I think the rules need to be relaxed a bit on the remote diagnosis thing, when the person with the raging personality disorder is RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

It's not hyperbole when it's literally true.

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by whell

A "confirmation" of narcissism? Again with the hyperbole, this time attempting to masquerade as "science"? You must be really desperate.

I'd be willing to wager that the folks rendering their opinions in this article are life-long Dems. Regardless, I thought making a diagnosis without a personal examination, taking medical history, etc, was a breach of ethics in medicine. Such ethical breaches don't seem to bother these folks too much, I guess.

A monkey could identify Trump or Clinton (Bill) as a narcissist. This is not rocket science.

That said, I find it distasteful for someone that is professional to offer diagnosis without protocol.

[noonereal]

Originally Posted by donquixote99

I think the rules need to be relaxed a bit on the remote diagnosis thing, when the person with the raging personality disorder is RUNNING FOR PRESIDENT.

It's not hyperbole when it's literally true.

and what makes a narcissist ill equipped to be president as you clearly suggest.

Seems Bill did a fine job blow jobs and slime aside.