|
|
|
|
We appreciate your help
in keeping this site going.
|
|

09-09-2015, 10:00 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,348
|
|
|
A trial of the perpetrators for abuse of authority resulting in death, and compensation for the family of the deceased seems reasonable. How the family uses the money is up to them, tho mandating a trust fund for surviving dependents to be administered by a trusted agent, and perhaps something directed to mentoring as a memorial would be appropriate.
Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
|

09-09-2015, 10:07 AM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catswiththum
That is the law of the jungle - I am sorry you feel that way.
I don't have to tell you the law exists for a fair and just hearing for the accused, regardless of the feelings of any one individual or group.
The officers have not had a trial, no evidence has been given, no testimony heard - the city has pronounced them guilty with this settlement and denied them that right.
|
It is just feelings, and I so identified them. But you wax hyperbolic. Law of the jungle would be throwing them to the mob. There will still to be trials, and their outcome is hardly certain.
Anyway, we're just arguing opinion. How 'fair and just' would the trials have been? How 'fair and just' will they be now? The thing cannot be measured. Is the quanta of negative 'fairness and justness' greater or lesser than the positive quanta (if any, you seem inclined to be unsure) of granting monetary recompense to the family now, and through a final settlement, instead of years from now after a court action and a string of appeals? That also cannot be measured. So your sorrow for my feelings is just more feelings. I'm tempted to say 'thanks for sharing.'
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
|

09-09-2015, 10:10 AM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad
Remember when I said I would ban myself for two weeks if I ever slip up and respond to him again?
Well I'm amending that.
It's now a 30 day self ban.
|
You're being too rough on yourself.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
|

09-09-2015, 10:10 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke
society ]
|
Is that what they call members of that community?
|

09-09-2015, 10:13 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Edge of America
Posts: 1,509
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99
It is just feelings, and I so identified them. But you wax hyperbolic. So your sorrow for my feelings is just more feelings. I'm tempted to say 'thanks for sharing.' 
|
You are welcome.
I will amend "law of the jungle."
Deliberately contravening the legal process and rights of the accused is more accurate.
__________________
Try to rely on yourself as much as possible - when things go to hell, you will know who to blame.
|

09-09-2015, 10:23 AM
|
 |
Persona non grata
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBS...
What a phucking joke... no suit has even been filed. 
|
Doesn't matter.
Their lawyers will still get 1/3 of that off the top.
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
|

09-09-2015, 10:37 AM
|
 |
Ready
|
|
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catswiththum
You are welcome.
I will amend "law of the jungle."
Deliberately contravening the legal process and rights of the accused is more accurate.
|
Said 'deliberate contravening' of the rights of the accused is not shown. It may, to whatever extent it exists, just be a by-product of the deliberate haste to provide for the family.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
|

09-09-2015, 10:54 AM
|
 |
Sir Lord Vader of Cheam
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lewiston, ID
Posts: 5,069
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad
Doesn't matter.
Their lawyers will still get 1/3 of that off the top.
|
The $$$ is cheaper than defense and quells a barbarian rabble.
Wolf meat or government cheese, call it either.
And the vermin will wind up paying for it, anyway, through increased enforcement.
Too perfect once officers are appropriately exonerated.
__________________
"American" means calling everyone who disagrees with you a traitor?
|

09-09-2015, 11:08 AM
|
|
Banned
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
|
|
|
I bet the Gray family will be spending that settlement somewhere else.
|

09-09-2015, 11:53 AM
|
 |
Senior Member
|
|
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by catswiththum
Whatever your opinion of the situation, the city, by reaching a settlement, is admitting guilt in the death of Freddie Grey before the trial of the 6 officers accused has even begun.
This effectively taints any jury pool - "if they are not guilty, why did the city pay 6.4 million dollars?"
The city has perverted the course of justice and dealt a serious blow to the officers' right to a fair trial.
|
No, they're not. They are acknowledging that Freddie Gray died unnecessarily while in custody. That much has been obvious and uncontested from the beginning. This makes the city liable for damages but it does not imply criminal behavior on the part of the 6 officers.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 PM.
|