Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-09-2015, 10:00 AM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,348
A trial of the perpetrators for abuse of authority resulting in death, and compensation for the family of the deceased seems reasonable. How the family uses the money is up to them, tho mandating a trust fund for surviving dependents to be administered by a trusted agent, and perhaps something directed to mentoring as a memorial would be appropriate.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-09-2015, 10:07 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by catswiththum View Post
That is the law of the jungle - I am sorry you feel that way.

I don't have to tell you the law exists for a fair and just hearing for the accused, regardless of the feelings of any one individual or group.

The officers have not had a trial, no evidence has been given, no testimony heard - the city has pronounced them guilty with this settlement and denied them that right.
It is just feelings, and I so identified them. But you wax hyperbolic. Law of the jungle would be throwing them to the mob. There will still to be trials, and their outcome is hardly certain.

Anyway, we're just arguing opinion. How 'fair and just' would the trials have been? How 'fair and just' will they be now? The thing cannot be measured. Is the quanta of negative 'fairness and justness' greater or lesser than the positive quanta (if any, you seem inclined to be unsure) of granting monetary recompense to the family now, and through a final settlement, instead of years from now after a court action and a string of appeals? That also cannot be measured. So your sorrow for my feelings is just more feelings. I'm tempted to say 'thanks for sharing.'
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-09-2015, 10:10 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad View Post
Remember when I said I would ban myself for two weeks if I ever slip up and respond to him again?

Well I'm amending that.

It's now a 30 day self ban.
You're being too rough on yourself.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-09-2015, 10:10 AM
djv8ga djv8ga is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zeke View Post
society ]
Is that what they call members of that community?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-09-2015, 10:13 AM
catswiththum's Avatar
catswiththum catswiththum is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Edge of America
Posts: 1,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
It is just feelings, and I so identified them. But you wax hyperbolic. So your sorrow for my feelings is just more feelings. I'm tempted to say 'thanks for sharing.'
You are welcome.

I will amend "law of the jungle."

Deliberately contravening the legal process and rights of the accused is more accurate.
__________________
Try to rely on yourself as much as possible - when things go to hell, you will know who to blame.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-09-2015, 10:23 AM
Tom Joad's Avatar
Tom Joad Tom Joad is offline
Persona non grata
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 12,654
Quote:
Originally Posted by JBS... View Post
What a phucking joke... no suit has even been filed.
Doesn't matter.

Their lawyers will still get 1/3 of that off the top.
__________________
"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-09-2015, 10:37 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,926
Quote:
Originally Posted by catswiththum View Post
You are welcome.

I will amend "law of the jungle."

Deliberately contravening the legal process and rights of the accused is more accurate.
Said 'deliberate contravening' of the rights of the accused is not shown. It may, to whatever extent it exists, just be a by-product of the deliberate haste to provide for the family.
__________________
By Any Means Necessary
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-09-2015, 10:54 AM
Zeke's Avatar
Zeke Zeke is offline
Sir Lord Vader of Cheam
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Lewiston, ID
Posts: 5,069
Send a message via Yahoo to Zeke
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Joad View Post
Doesn't matter.

Their lawyers will still get 1/3 of that off the top.
The $$$ is cheaper than defense and quells a barbarian rabble.

Wolf meat or government cheese, call it either.

And the vermin will wind up paying for it, anyway, through increased enforcement.

Too perfect once officers are appropriately exonerated.
__________________
"American" means calling everyone who disagrees with you a traitor?
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-09-2015, 11:08 AM
djv8ga djv8ga is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
I bet the Gray family will be spending that settlement somewhere else.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-09-2015, 11:53 AM
Boreas's Avatar
Boreas Boreas is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Posts: 20,496
Quote:
Originally Posted by catswiththum View Post
Whatever your opinion of the situation, the city, by reaching a settlement, is admitting guilt in the death of Freddie Grey before the trial of the 6 officers accused has even begun.

This effectively taints any jury pool - "if they are not guilty, why did the city pay 6.4 million dollars?"

The city has perverted the course of justice and dealt a serious blow to the officers' right to a fair trial.
No, they're not. They are acknowledging that Freddie Gray died unnecessarily while in custody. That much has been obvious and uncontested from the beginning. This makes the city liable for damages but it does not imply criminal behavior on the part of the 6 officers.
__________________
Smoke me a kipper. I'll be back for breakfast.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:34 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.