Clinton e-mails, for the lawyers

[icenine]

Actually can you really destroy the email. If it is received from another account then it exists somewhere else. If Hillary sent an email and destroyed it later that email is on another server somewhere. And it looks like none were classified at the time. It looks like the only thing she could have destroyed was a file or email she never sent anywhere.

Perhaps Hillary had a shared yahoo account with another person (i.e. the other person knew the password too) and instead of emailing she would just file an email in a draft folder and the other person would open up said draft folder on another computer halfway around the world, just like on 24 and Alias. Then they would have not email trail to investigate.

Of course Yahoo would be able to find out the locations of where the account was opened.

I am sure when Hillary is indicted it will all come out. That should be just around the corner.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Boreas

Personal emails, according to Sec. Clinton. I'm aware of no contradictory evidence.

Might that be because of a possible obstruction of the investigation (i.e., destroying files)? Had she used the State system, her emails would have been archived where she couldn't have destroyed them. This is a problem of her own making and she's made a hash out of dealing with it.

It seems you're willing to give Hillary the benefit of the doubt when it comes to trust/truthfulness. She's done nothing over the years to deserve it. Until this mess, I would have been happy to support and defend Hillary. No longer. She's dishonest, aloof and a decidedly lousy candidate.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Those who see nothing wrong with Hillary's email problems don't want to see problems. She seemingly handled and stored classified information improperly and destroyed government records subject to a FOIA request. Then she handled the issue dismissively and dishonestly.

The White House certainly recognizes the problem as its spokesman, Josh Earnest, took a shot across the bow of Hillary's candidacy yesterday.

Here we go again.

Finn gettin his daily "Hillary Hate" on.

[Boreas]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Might that be because of a possible obstruction of the investigation (i.e., destroying files)? Had she used the State system, her emails would have been archived where she couldn't have destroyed them.

It seems you're willing to give Hillary the benefit of the doubt when it comes to truthfulness. She's done nothing over the years to deserve it.

That's precisely what I'm willing to give her and precisely what you refuse to giver her. That's what pisses me off about this whole mess, that supposed "liberals" are buying into this bullshit right wing witch hunt.

As to her having "done nothing over the years to deserve" the benefit of the doubt, what, in your estimation, has she done to disqualify herself from a fair hearing?

Pursuant to the deleted emails, there have been reports mentioning that internet forensics experts are pretty confident that they can recover them.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

Here we go again.

Finn gettin his daily "Hillary Hate" on.

I don't do hate, dipshit. I leave that to you.

[catswiththum]

Originally Posted by Boreas

"liberals" are buying into this bullshit right wing witch hunt.

This has to be the most tired, ill used political phrase in history.

Any time a politician is caught with their pants down, it's a "witch hunt." Next time I get a speeding ticket, I'll try that.

I'm sure if it was John Boehner or Ted Cruz in the crosshairs it would be "a vigorous examination for the cause of justice."

The law is no respecter of persons - or parties.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Boreas

That's precisely what I'm willing to give her and precisely what you refuse to giver her. That's what pisses me off about this whole mess, that supposed "liberals" are buying into this bullshit right wing witch hunt.

As to her having "done nothing over the years to deserve" the benefit of the doubt, what, in your estimation, has she done to disqualify herself from a fair hearing?

The DOJ and FBI are conducting a right-wing witch hunt? Yeh, right.

I suppose you bought her story about the long sought Rose law firm billing records associated with the Whitewater investigation just happening to materialize on a White House table.

You can trust and adore Hillary all you want. I don't. In my book, she dismissive, untrustworthy and a lousy candidate. YMMV.

[Tom Joad]

Originally Posted by catswiththum

The law is no respecter of persons - or parties.

If that were true, Bush, Cheney, and dozens of others in that administration would have been tried, convicted, and executed for war crimes.

[catswiththum]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

If that were true, Bush, Cheney, and dozens of others in that administration would have been tried, convicted, and executed for war crimes.

That is your opinion, and not one shared by the UN investigation in to the matter.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by Tom Joad

If that were true, Bush, Cheney, and dozens of others in that administration would have been tried, convicted, and executed for war crimes.

It was Obama who made a conscious decision not to do so and it had nothing to do with a desire to allow them to get away with any possible crimes.