Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Current events
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:10 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,327
SCOTUS To Hear Same Sex Marriage Case Tomorrow

"When a federal judge declared same-sex marriage legal in Florida earlier this year, it should have changed the way Bruce Stone does his job. The estate-planning attorney had for years helped gay couples patch together legal documents to try to approximate some of the protections enjoyed by heterosexual spouses.
But with the Supreme Court about to decide later this year whether that court decision and others ought to stand, Stone isn’t taking any chances. He is still writing up those power-of-attorney forms and setting up trusts out of state, and he has some stark advice for his gay clients: “Do not get married here in Florida.”
On Tuesday, the Supreme Court is set to hear arguments over whether gay couples have a constitutional right to get married. But if the court rules against that right, the ability to decide reverts back to the states, and Florida and others might just slam the door." WaPo

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...a32_story.html

Here we go.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-27-2015, 12:48 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,327
This all hinges on two unlikely bedfellows, Justice's Kennedy & Scalia.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...y.html?hpid=z1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-27-2015, 01:55 PM
Ike Bana Ike Bana is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 8,310
Seems to me if Kennedy supports gay marriage it's all over, unless there's something specific in it that might turn one of the typical progressives on the court against it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-27-2015, 02:59 PM
Pio1980's Avatar
Pio1980 Pio1980 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: NE Bamastan
Posts: 11,348
Constitutionally, I don't see how anyone can successfully argue that the State has a compelling interest in prohibition. OTOH, claiming "State's Rights" without recalling that phrase in a Southern accent as a euphemism for state sponsored racism is pretty much impossible for folks with an appreciation for history.

Sent from my SM-N900V using Tapatalk
__________________
I'll believe corporations are people when Texas executes one.

Last edited by Pio1980; 04-27-2015 at 04:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-28-2015, 06:20 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,327
http://www.washingtonpost.com/politi...y.html?hpid=z1

It looks like the forces of equality will win out here. Hallelujah.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinio...y.html?hpid=z4

Last edited by bobabode; 04-28-2015 at 07:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:59 PM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.