Hillary For President

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Hillary has been 'up to her eyeballs' in shady money games? So far it's a Breitbart shill and former Bush II speechwriter unsuccessfully trying to connect some dots.

Along with the NYTimes and WashPost. Will you equally disregard criticism of Jeb if it comes from anyone with liberal leanings?

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by djv8ga

Give it time...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JEUC4FSVsCM

Faux Newz? Pardon me while I laugh, bro.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by finnbow

Along with the NYTimes and WashPost. Will you equally disregard criticism of Jeb if it comes from anyone with liberal leanings?

You forgot to highlight the operative word, "unsuccessfully" Pat.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by bobabode

You forgot to highlight the operative word, "unsuccessfully" Pat.

While the dots are not connected in terms of overt acts of bribery, the dots are connected perfectly well in terms of conflict-of-interest violations.

[djv8ga]

Originally Posted by bobabode

Faux Newz? Pardon me while I laugh, bro.

That's cool dude. I've been laughing @ all of your posts in this thread. I know you don't believe them. Funny Stuff!

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by finnbow

While the dots are not connected in terms of overt acts of bribery, the dots are connected perfectly well in terms of conflict-of-interest violations.

File an amicus brief with the US Attorney's office, then.

[bobabode]

Originally Posted by djv8ga

That's cool dude. I've been laughing @ all of your posts in this thread. I know you don't believe them. Funny Stuff!

Damn you DJ. I guess you outted me.

I'd take Huey Long http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huey_Long over any Rescumlican in this race. The stakes boil down to this, the next POTUS will name replacements to the Supreme Court and I really hope Scalia's is one of them.

Presidents come and go, SCOTUS justices are for life.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by bobabode

File an amicus brief with the US Attorney's office, then.

I'm not insistent upon prosecution of Hillary for her blatant conflict-of-interest violations. OTOH, a Presidential candidate needs to convince the public of her honesty and trustworthiness, something she has failed to do. To wit, recent polls in swing states indicated that a majority of registered voters in swing states do not feel that Hillary is honest and trustworthy.

[bobabode]

I don't give a crap in Nate Silver's hat about polls 18 months before the election. Other than for entertainment value, they're meaningless.

[finnbow]

Originally Posted by bobabode

I don't give a crap in Nate Silver's hat about polls 18 months before the election. Other for entertainment value, they're meaningless.

I don't think it's meaningless that the sole viable Democratic candidate (thus far, anyway) is viewed as dishonest and untrustworthy by a majority of voters in swing states. It could stay that way unless she comes out and addresses the substance of these issues directly rather than having surrogates poo-poo them by attacking the author and not addressing the substance.