Political Forums  

Go Back   Political Forums > Politics
Register FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

We appreciate your help

in keeping this site going.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #161  
Old 04-22-2015, 01:21 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boreas View Post
She's our very own Maggie Thatcher.
Only if she invades some small island nation...

Like the Turks and Caicos or the Caymans.
Reply With Quote
  #162  
Old 04-22-2015, 01:27 PM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
Only if she invades some small island nation...

Like the Turks and Caicos or the Caymans.
She won't invade the Caymans. All her donors and Wall Street friends have their money down there.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.
Reply With Quote
  #163  
Old 04-22-2015, 01:33 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by finnbow View Post
She won't invade the Caymans. All her donors and Wall Street friends have their money down there.
Never expected you to be a freakin' commie anti-establishment type, Pat.
Reply With Quote
  #164  
Old 04-22-2015, 03:29 PM
Rajoo's Avatar
Rajoo Rajoo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Sierras
Posts: 15,280
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
Only if she invades some small island nation...

Like the Turks and Caicos or the Caymans.
Hope she follows Reagan's Grenada war plan. I hate bloodshed.
__________________
The issue today is the same as it has been throughout all history, whether man shall be allowed to govern himself or be ruled by a small elite. Thomas Jefferson
Reply With Quote
  #165  
Old 04-22-2015, 03:42 PM
bobabode's Avatar
bobabode bobabode is offline
Admin
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Behind the Orange Curtain in California
Posts: 38,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by BeamOn View Post
Hope she follows Reagan's Grenada war plan. I hate bloodshed.
I suspect she'll follow Obama's lead and invade Cuba with touristas.
I hear Caracas is ripe for the taking, nice beaches & beautiful natives...
Reply With Quote
  #166  
Old 04-22-2015, 09:04 PM
Rex E.'s Avatar
Rex E. Rex E. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Willamette Valley
Posts: 3,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by bobabode View Post
Only if she invades some small island nation...

Like the Turks and Caicos or the Caymans.
Ireland......
__________________
"if men got pregnant, there would be a constitutional right to abortion on demand."
Reply With Quote
  #167  
Old 04-22-2015, 09:06 PM
djv8ga djv8ga is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: The Open Border
Posts: 5,126
_- Rubio -_
Reply With Quote
  #168  
Old 04-23-2015, 07:04 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Per the NYTimes, the Clinton Foundation and Bill cashed in big time as the Russians took over a large North American uranium mining company while Hillary was SoS (and for which government approval was necessary).

The sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.

And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.


http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04/24/us...m-company.html

This kind of behavior would land normal Executive Branch employees in jail.
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 04-23-2015 at 07:28 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #169  
Old 04-23-2015, 07:51 AM
donquixote99's Avatar
donquixote99 donquixote99 is offline
Ready
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 19,930
Is the law on export licenses really so loose that all you have to do to evade it is sell the uranium to another firm that does have a license? What a sham if so.

Finn, could you expand on your last sentence? Specifically, what laws with criminal penalties do you see being broken here, by what specific acts?
Reply With Quote
  #170  
Old 04-23-2015, 08:52 AM
finnbow's Avatar
finnbow finnbow is offline
Reformed Know-Nothing
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: MoCo, MD
Posts: 26,554
Quote:
Originally Posted by donquixote99 View Post
Is the law on export licenses really so loose that all you have to do to evade it is sell the uranium to another firm that does have a license? What a sham if so.

Finn, could you expand on your last sentence? Specifically, what laws with criminal penalties do you see being broken here, by what specific acts?
A criminal conflict of interest statute, 18 U.S.C. § 208, prohibits an employee from participating personally and substantially, in an official capacity, in any “particular matter” that would have a direct and predictable effect on the employee’s own financial interests or on the financial interests of:

- the employee’s spouse or minor child;
- a general partner of a partnership in which the employee is a limited or general partner;
- an organization in which the employee serves as an officer, director, trustee, general partner, or employee; or
- a person with whom the employee is negotiating for or has an arrangement concerning prospective employment.

http://www.oge.gov/Topics/Financial-...ent-Employees/

Moreover, Federal employees at such levels are required to annually disclose any and all forms of outside income for themselves, spouses and immediate family members. Back when I was a Federal bigwig, I was specifically directed to recuse myself from any decision-making that may have impacted (or even appeared to impact) any company whose equities I owned, for example. Taking money directly from any of them would have landed me in jail (something I was made acutely aware of in annual briefings on conflicts of interests).
__________________
As long as the roots are not severed, all will be well in the garden.

Last edited by finnbow; 04-23-2015 at 08:58 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:42 AM.



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.